Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT138 S2 Q16 Explanation

Judge: The defendant admits

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Strengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Judge: The defendant admits noncompliance with national building codes but asks that penalties not be imposed because he was confused as to whether national or local building codes applied to the area in which he was building. This excuse might be acceptable had he been charged with charged with noncompliance with national codes, his excuse is unacceptable.

What this question is testing

Principle-Strengthen

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify

Answer choices

  1. Weakens5% picked this

    Local codes and national codes must not overlap with

    This weakens the argument by making the defendant’s excuse more plausible. If local and national codes do not overlap it makes it less likely that the national codes would apply regardless of the area.

  2. Weakens14% picked this

    Local codes may be less strict, but not more strict, than

    This makes it so that any behavior required by local codes is required by national codes and makes it less likely that national codes would apply.

  3. Correct61% picked this

    Any behavior required by national codes is also required by

    Why this is right

    This would ensure that regardless of whether the local or national codes applied in the area in which the defendant was building, the national codes would apply.

    Skill tested: Principle-Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope11% picked this

    Ignorance of the difference between two codes is not an adequate

    The defendant did not claim ignorance of the difference between local and national codes, but rather ignorance of which applied in the area in which he was building.

  5. Weakens9% picked this

    A behavior that is in compliance with one law is not necessarily in

    This weakens the argument by making the defendant’s excuse more plausible. If local and national codes do not overlap it makes it less likely that the national codes would apply regardless of the area.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free