Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT138 S2 Q10 Explanation

People who are allergic to cats

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

People who are allergic to cats are actually allergic to certain proteins found in the animals' skin secretions and saliva; which particular proteins are responsible, however, varies from allergy sufferer to allergy sufferer. Since all cats shed skin and spread saliva around their environment, there is no such thing as a cat an allergic reaction in some­—but not all—people who are allergic to cats.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Trap4% picked this

    Any particular individual will be allergic to some breeds of cat but

    Too Strong / Too Broad: any particular individual We're told that it's common for someone with a cat allergy to be allergic to some cats but not others. But not everyone has a cat allergy! The fact that this answer applies to everyone is grounds for dismissal. Another more subtle reason to dismiss this answer is "breeds of cats." We talke about individual cats but not about their different breeds.

  2. Too Strong: no14% picked this

    No cat is capable of causing an allergic reaction in all types

    We're told it is common for a given cat to cause an allergic reaction in some but not all people who are allergic to cats. But that still leaves open the possibility that some cat out there has a perfect storm of allergy-inducing skin and spit proteins and could wreak allergic havoc on every cat-allergy sufferer.

  3. Correct59% picked this

    Not all cats are identical with respect to the proteins contained in their skin

    Why this is right

    The first thing that should make us like this answer is the "not all ___ are ___ " format. This style of claim is VERY easy to support. It only takes 1 cat that's different from the rest to prove that they're not all identical. So, that's a strong start to the answer. Do we have reason to believe that not all cats have identical proteins? Sure. The proteins are what cause the allergies, and different proteins aggravate different people, and it's common for a cat that triggers one person's allergies not to trigger somebody else's. One possible explanation for this set of curious facts is that different cats have different proteins. What makes this question so hard is that this isn't the only possible explanation. It's also possible that all cats have the same proteins and the different reactions are 100% explained by the difference among the people who are allergic. The fact that this answer would be wrong on a Must Be True question makes lots of people eliminate it. But since this is a Most Supported question, that's not grounds for dismissal. An answer that doesn't have to be true might still end up being the best available choice, and in this case, it is.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope: intensity / other allergies8% picked this

    The allergic reactions of some people who are allergic to cats are more intense than the allergic reactions

    The intensity of the allergic reactions are not discussed, and neither are people who suffer from allergies other than cat allergies: those are both out of scope ideas. This answer is also making a comparison that isn't justified by the facts: an Unsupported Comparison, one of the most common Most Supported wrong answer types.

  5. Too Strong / Speculative15% picked this

    There is no way to predict whether a given cat will produce an allergic reaction in

    Too Strong / Speculative: no way to predict We are told that different proteins cause different people to have allergic reactions, and that some cats provoke some people but not others. But does that really support the claim that there are zero ways to predict whether a certain cat will make a certain person react? That's too speculative. We don't have any info about allergy prediction. Maybe certain breeds of cat tend to have certain proteins, and maybe certain allergy symptoms are the result of particular proteins. If we knew that Mancoons have protein X and that protein X causes itchy eyes but not sneezing, and we know that Greg gets itchy eyes around cats but doesn't sneeze, we could reasonably predict that Greg would be allergic to Max the Mancoon.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free