Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT137 S4 Q13 Explanation

Business ethicist: Managers of corporations

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Business ethicist: Managers of corporations have an obligation to serve shareholders as the shareholders would want to be served. Therefore, corporate managers have an the shareholders' best interest.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.

Common trap

Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.

Winning move

Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

The business ethicist's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following

Answer choices

  1. Too Weak6% picked this

    Corporate managers are always able to discern what is in the best

    This makes it possible for corporate managers to act in the shareholders’ best interest, but does not provide an obligation to do so.

  2. Correct83% picked this

    Shareholders would want to be served only in ways that are in their

    Why this is right

    This bridges the gap SW ? SBI between the ways shareholders want to be served and those that are in the shareholders best interests.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Weak4% picked this

    A corporate manager's obligations to shareholders take precedence over any other obligations the

    This defends the argument from corporate managers having other overriding obligations, but it does not ensure an obligation to act in the shareholders’ best interest.

  4. Too Weak6% picked this

    The shareholders have interests that can best be served by

    This does support the view that corporate managers should play a role, but it does not go far enough and ensure that corporate managers not only play a role, but are obligated to do so in a specific way.

  5. Out of Scope1% picked this

    All shareholders want to be served in

    Whether shareholders want to be served in identical ways is not relevant to whether corporate managers are obligated to act in ways that best serve shareholder interests.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free