Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT137 S4 Q1 Explanation

Economist: Prosperity is a driving force

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Economist: Prosperity is a driving force behind increases in the release of carbon dioxide, the main cause of global warming. As incomes rise, more people spend money on energy-consuming devices such as cars, thereby producing more carbon dioxide. Also, there were steep drops in carbon dioxide emissions.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
1.

Which one of the following most accurately states the overall conclusion drawn in

Answer choices

  1. Too Narrow6% picked this

    Carbon dioxide is the main cause of

    While this point is included within the argument’s conclusion, the main point is broader and includes a linkage between economic prosperity and increases in the release of carbon dioxide.

  2. Correct89% picked this

    Prosperity is an important cause of increases in the release of

    Why this is right

    This best paraphrases the argument’s main point.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Premise2% picked this

    When incomes rise, more people spend money on

    This is part of the argument’s first premise.

  4. Premise0% picked this

    Countries that experienced deep economic recessions also experienced steep drops in

    This is the argument’s second premise.

  5. Premise3% picked this

    When people spend money on energy-consuming devices, more carbon dioxide is produced

    This is part of the argument’s first premise.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free