A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.
Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests
Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.
Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.
Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.
The claim that dogs learn best when they are trained using both voice commands and hand signals figures in the argument in which one of the following ways?
It is an explicit premise
4% picked this
It is an implicit assumption
1% picked this
It is a statement of
1% picked this
It is a statement that
Why this is right
Answer D is correct.
Skill tested: Role · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.
91% picked this
It is an intermediate conclusion
3% picked this
Continue the review in LSAT Lab
Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.
Turn this review into a targeted study plan.
Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.