A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.
Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests
Most apartments on the UF -most↣ SV upper floors of The Vista Arms apartment building have scenic views.
So there is in the SA ↢some↣ SV building at least one studio apartment with scenic views.
The argument assumes UF -most↣ SA that most apartments on the upper floors of The Vista Arms apartment building are studio apartments.
The conclusion of the argument follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?
All of the apartments on
It could be that none of the apartments on the lower floors are studio apartments, in which case this would be irrelevant.
0% picked this
All of the apartments in
This supports the premise in the argument. Furthermore, neither the premise nor this has information that suggests that there is even one studio apartment in the building.
1% picked this
Most of the apartments in
These studio apartments could all be on lower floors of the building and it could be that none of them have scenic views.
6% picked this
Most of the apartments with
This reverses the premise of the argument.
7% picked this
Most of the apartments on
Why this is right
This matches the UF -most? SV anticipated answer. UF -most? SA Two “most” ? SV ?some? SA statements with the common term on the left of both implies a minimum relationship between the other terms.
Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.
85% picked this
Continue the review in LSAT Lab
Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.
Turn this review into a targeted study plan.
Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.