Because dried peat moss, which is derived from sphagnum moss, contains no chemical additives and is a renewable resource, many gardeners use large amounts of it as a soil conditioner in the belief that the practice is environmentally sound.
Conclusion
(They are mistaken) Using sphagnum moss as a soil conditioner is not environmentally sound.
Evidence
Sphagnum moss is maybe the biggest single contributor of oxygen to the atmosphere, and the garden soil industry is depleting is.
Evaluate
We know we want the conclusion to let us prove that using SM as a soil conditioner isn't an environmentally sound practice, so that's the right side of our principle:
practice → environmentally is not sound
What should go on the right side? Why is this practice environmentally unsound?
Because it depletes one of the biggest oxygen providers in the world.
Goal
So we want something like
depletes one of practice is not the biggest sources → environmentally sound of oxygen globally