Reading Comprehension

PT135 · S3 · P1 · Q3 Latina Autobiographies

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In the 1980s there was a proliferation of poetry collections, short stories, and novels published by women of Latin American descent in the United States.

Topic

The 1980s rise of Latina autobiography — innovative collections by Moraga, Levins Morales/Morales, and Anzaldúa — and how these writers experimented with the genre.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy. The author celebrates how Latina autobiographers pushed past traditional generic boundaries to express the complexities of their identities.

Main Point

Latina autobiographers of the 1980s revolutionized the genre, redrawing its boundaries to make it more amenable to expressing the complexity of their multiple cultural identities. They mixed languages, mixed genres, and even mixed authorial voices.

P1: The 1980s flourishing

The 1980s saw a proliferation of poetry, short stories, and novels by U.S. Latinas, plus the autobiography genre coming into prominence with three notable collections: Moraga's Loving in the War Years, Levins Morales/Morales's Getting Home Alive, and Anzaldúa's Borderlands/La Frontera.

P2: The collections' shared innovations

They mix English and Spanish (linguistic boundaries), explore intersections of ethnicity, gender, and language (multiple cultural identities), and combine essays, sketches, short stories, poems, and journal entries (generic mixing) without giving preference to any one mode.

P3: Three concrete examples — and the most experimental, Getting Home Alive

Anzaldúa juxtaposes narrative and poetry. Moraga mixes genres and arranges events by political development rather than chronology — a difference critics see between women's and men's autobiographies. Getting Home Alive goes furthest from convention: it has two authors (mother and daughter), woven together rather than separated, with one piece sometimes commenting on the other. The ordering may seem fragmentary but is fully intentional. The mixing of structures parallels the content — multigeneric and multivocal forms expressing the complexities of identity formation.

3.

The author's discussion of Getting Home Alive serves primarily to

  1. distinguish one type of experimental

    Wrong Purpose

    While the author is distinguishing this book from the other two by saying that it departs farthest from conventions, that doesn't make it a different type of autobiography. The passage isn't classifying experimental autobiographies into types. The discussion places Getting Home Alive on a continuum with the others in terms of being innovative / departing from the usual conventions. GHA goes "even further" in the same direction. In a sense, it would be an oxymoron to classify any of these three as belonging to a "type", since they are innovative, meaning they haven't been done before. If you're the first of your kind, you don't belong to a type. And you haven't invented a "type" until others follow a similar template.

    8% picked this

  2. explain how certain Latina autobiographers

    Wrong Purpose

    We have no evidence that GHA has any journal entries in it. In P2, journal entries were listed among the various forms of modes of presentation you might find within these mixed-genre autobiographies. But it never says they all have journal entries. This answer demands that we can look at the chunk in P3 about GHA and find any explanation of how they combined journal entries and poems. That chunk only mentions poems.

    2% picked this

  3. demonstrate that the use of

    Wrong View

    Multiple voices — meaning multiple authors — is what makes Getting Home Alive distinctive, not a "common feature" of Latina autobiography. This is describing the exact way that GHA departs even further from conventions. This is the unique, out-there thing the author finds noteworthy about this book.

    5% picked this

  4. show why readers have difficulty

    Wrong View

    There is an acknowledgment that the structure may "seem fragmentary and confusing", and so that could explain why readers have difficulty understanding some Latina writers. But where did it ever say that any readers have difficulty understanding them? And why would we say that our author's agenda in this paragraph is to explain why readers struggle to read these writers? Isn't it more to present how they are innovative from your typical autobiography?

    1% picked this

  5. Correct

    illustrate the extent of certain

    Why this is right

    This reinforces the rhetorical connection language of "departing even further" from autobiographical convention. When you deviate from the mold / from the conventional form, then you are experimenting / tinkering with new forms and new structures. The author uses GHA to show how far these Latina writers pushed the genre's boundaries: they have an autobiography about two different lives at the same time!

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    86% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free