Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT135 S3 P1 Q3 Explanation

Latina Autobiographies

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocal PurposeHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

In the 1980s there was a proliferation of poetry collections, short stories, and novels published by women of Latin American descent in the United States. By the end of the decade, another genre of U.S. Latina writing, the autobiography, also came into prominence with the publication of three notable autobiographical collections: Loving by Aurora Levins Morales and Rosario Morales; and Borderlands/La Frontera, by Gloria Anzaldúa.

These collections are innovative at many levels. They confront traditional linguistic boundaries by using a mix of English and Spanish, and they each address the politics of multiple cultural identities by exploring the interrelationships among such factors as ethnicity, gender, and language. This effort manifests itself in the generically mixed structure of the most part, giving preference to any of these modes of presentation.

In Borderlands/La Frontera, Anzaldúa presents her personal history and the history of the Mexican American community to which she belongs by juxtaposing narrative sequences and poetry. Moraga’s Loving in the War Years is likewise characterized by a mixture of genres, and, as she states in her introduction, the events in her life employ multigeneric and multivocal forms to express the complexities inherent in the formation of their identities.

Rather than forcing their personal histories to conform to existing generic parameters, these writers have revolutionized the genre of autobiography, redrawing the boundaries of this literary form to make it more amenable to the expression of their own experiences. In doing so, they have shown a strong determination to has for too long taken their silence for granted.

What this question is testing

Local Purpose

Anticipate

This is a Local Purpose question. Why does the author bring up Getting Home Alive?

P3 frames it as departing "even further" from convention than the other two books. So among the experimental Latina autobiographies, this one goes the furthest. The author uses it as the most extreme example to show how far these writers pushed the genre's boundaries.

Goal

Find the answer about illustrating the extent of formal experimentation. Common traps:

Answers that say it distinguishes types — the passage isn't classifying types

Answers that focus on one technique (journal entries + poems) — too narrow

Answers that say multiple voices is a "common feature" — only Getting Home Alive has multiple authors

Answers about reader confusion — the passage emphasizes intentionality, not confusion

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
3.

The author’s discussion of Getting Home Alive serves

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Purpose7% picked this

    distinguish one type of experimental autobiography from two other types by

    The passage isn't classifying experimental autobiographies into types. The discussion places Getting Home Alive on a continuum with the others — going "even further" — not categorizing them as different types.

  2. Wrong Purpose2% picked this

    explain how certain Latina autobiographers combine journal entries and poems in

    This is too narrow. The passage doesn't focus on journal entries + poems specifically — it focuses on the dual-author structure (mother and daughter woven together) as the defining innovation. The journal-entry/poem mix is part of the broader generic mixing common to all three works.

  3. Wrong View5% picked this

    demonstrate that the use of multiple voices is a common feature

    Multiple voices — meaning multiple authors — is what makes Getting Home Alive distinctive, not a "common feature" of Latina autobiography. The other two books have single authors. So calling it a common feature is the opposite of what the passage emphasizes.

  4. Wrong View1% picked this

    show why readers have difficulty understanding certain autobiographies by

    The passage emphasizes that the structure may "seem fragmentary and confusing" but is "in fact a fully intentional and carefully designed experiment." The author is defending the structure against any charge of confusion, not using Getting Home Alive to explain why readers struggle.

  5. Correct86% picked this

    illustrate the extent of certain Latina autobiographers' experimentation with form

    Why this is right

    This captures the discussion's function. Getting Home Alive is introduced as departing "even further" from autobiographical convention than the other works — the most extreme example of formal/structural experimentation. The author uses it to show how far these Latina writers pushed the genre's boundaries — illustrating the extent of their experimentation.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free