Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT135 S2 Q8 Explanation

Caldwell: The government recently

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Caldwell: The government recently demolished a former naval base. Among the complex's facilities were a gymnasium, a swimming pool, office buildings, gardens, and housing for hundreds of people. Of course the government was legally permitted to use these facilities as it wished. But clearly, using them for the good the government's actions were not only inefficient but immoral.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
8.

Caldwell's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds

Answer choices

  1. Correct81% picked this

    fails to consider that an action may be morally permissible even if an alternative course of action

    Why this is right

    This answer attacks the assumption by pointing out the difference between the morality of an action and whether that action is to everyone's advantage.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Contradiction8% picked this

    presumes, without providing justification, that the actual consequences of an action are irrelevant to the

    The argument does assume that the consequences of an action are relevant to the action's moral permissibility.

  3. Too Strong1% picked this

    presumes, without providing justification, that the government never acts in the

    The argument concludes that the government did not act in the most efficient manner in this case, but not in all cases.

  4. Irrelevant Relationship5% picked this

    presumes, without providing justification, that any action that is efficient is

    The argument does conclude that the government's action was both immoral and inefficient, but not that all immoral actions are inefficient.

  5. Wrong Flaw6% picked this

    inappropriately treats two possible courses of action as if they were

    The argument does not rule out other possible courses of action. Instead it judges one action on the grounds that another, possibly preferable, action was possible.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free