Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT134 S4 P4 Q25 Explanation

Dostoyevsky’s Position on Literature

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

During Dostoyevsky’s time there were two significant and opposing directions in Russian literary criticism. One position maintained that art stood high above the present and the everyday, while the radical view maintained that art had a right to exist only if it found its sources in concrete reality, and, through the exposure distinction in principle between fantasy and reality, and reality was far more than the merely tangible.

The radical critics’ demand that reality be depicted “as it is” was meaningless for Dostoyevsky; reality was necessarily shaped by the person who experienced it: what may not be reality for you may be reality for me. The task of the writer was to explode the boundaries of the so-called real world. be so intimately bound up with the real that one almost believes in it.”

The radical critics’ insistence that art must serve a particular political view was for Dostoyevsky the equivalent of assigning to art “a shameful destiny.” A literary work must stand or fall on its “artistic merit,” he explained. The utilitarian claim that the formal aspects of a work were of secondary importance so has fully understood the author’s thoughts. Therefore, artistry is quite simply the ability to write well.”

The radical critics’ requirement that art must at all costs be “useful” to people and society seemed to Dostoyevsky unsatisfactory. How can we know what will show itself to be useful? Can we say with assurance how useful the Iliad has been to humankind? No, Dostoyevsky believed, when it comes to this purpose because we cannot see clearly what paths it may take to become useful.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

It can be inferred from the passage that Dostoyevsky would most likely have agreed with which one of the following statements about the view held by some Russian

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: must have fantasy12% picked this

    It is correct because of its requirement that art have a strong element

    We would rather see an answer lead with "incorrect", since our primary support is Dostoyevsky "as a realist, insisting that reality is art's crucial source". But we can definitely get rid of this because it says that Position 1 was a requirement that "art must include strong fantastical elements". When Position 1 is talking about standing high above the present and the everyday, that doesn't mean sci-fi or fantasy. It probably just means "art should aim for the timeless and the profound, not the ephemeral and boring minutiae of day to day life."

  2. Out of Scope: defining reality23% picked this

    It is correct because it recognizes that reality is more than just an enumeration of the

    We would rather see an answer lead with "incorrect", since our primary support is Dostoyevsky "as a realist, insisting that reality is art's crucial source", which disagrees with Position 1's claim that "art should be avoiding the everyday reality". But we can definitely get rid of this because it says that Position 1 defined reality a certain way. But Position 1 is only defining what art should be. It doesn't make any comment about what reality is.

  3. Correct45% picked this

    It is incorrect because reality must be the foundation of

    Why this is right

    In the penultimate sentence of the 1st paragraph, we're told that Dostoyevsky "as a realist, insisted that reality is literature's crucial source". Since Position 1 said that all art (including literature) should "stand high above the present and everyday", it would think that literary art should be timeless and profound. Dostoyevsky thinks that literary art should be informed by the author's everyday reality / experience of the world. So we can support that D would say, "Y'all are wrong. Reality is literature's crucial source, not the timeless / profound stuff."

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Wrong Objection12% picked this

    It is incorrect because it makes no distinction between reality

    We're fine with "it's incorrect", because we know that D took a 3rd position since he disagreed with each of the first two. How did he disagree with Position 1? "as a realist, he never doubted that reality was literature's crucial source" That's all we have to go off, and it sounds more like this complaint (C) "you're wrong, literature should be about reality" than it sounds like this complaint (D) "you're wrong, you're failing to see a difference between reality and fantasy" What could also help us eliminate this is the fact that distinguishing between a sense of reality that includes fantasy and one that doesn't is how D goes about disagreeing with Position 2, not with Position 1.

  5. Wrong Position8% picked this

    It is incorrect because of its insistence that art further some

    This answer is how Dostoyevsky would respond to the second group of critics, the radical view. This question stem is about how D would respond to the first group, the pretentious art lovers.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free