The conventional process for tanning leather uses large amounts of calcium oxide and sodium sulfide.
Evidence
Tanning leather using biological catalysts costs about the same as using these conventional chemical if the cost of waste disposal is left out of the comparison.
However, nearly 20 percent less waste is produced with biological catalysts.
Waste disposal is a substantial part of the overall cost of tanning.
Conclusion
It is therefore less costly to tan leather if biological catalysts are used instead.
Evaluate
Since the cost of both processes is the same if the cost of waste disposal is left out of the comparison, it follows that for biological catalysts to be less costly than conventional chemicals the difference in cost must come from waste disposal. Biological catalysts produce 20 percent less waste than conventional chemicals. So long as the cost of waste disposal from each process is the same or the cost of waste disposal from conventional chemicals is more than from biological catalysts the argument is safe.