Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT134 S2 Q16 Explanation

Anyone who believes in extraterrestrials

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParallel Flaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Anyone who believes in extraterrestrials believes in UFOs. But the existence of UFOs has been conclusively refuted. Therefore a false as well.

What this question is testing

Parallel Flaw

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

Which one of the following arguments contains flawed reasoning most similar to that in

Answer choices

  1. Correct53% picked this

    Anyone who believes in unicorns believes in centaurs. But it has been demonstrated that there are no centaurs, so

    Why this is right

    If you believe in Unicorns, you believe Centaurs. Centaurs don’t exist. Thus, Unicorns don’t exist.

    Skill tested: Parallel Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Not a Flaw1% picked this

    Anyone who believes in unicorns believes in centaurs. But you do not believe in centaurs, so you do

    This is valid logic. This avoids the belief vs. fact flaw of the original argument.

  3. Bad Premise Match / Bad Conclusion Match0% picked this

    Anyone who believes in unicorns believes in centaurs. But you do not believe in unicorns, so you do

    This doesn’t perform the belief vs. fact flaw of the original. And it doesn’t try to argue by contrapositive. It argues by way of illegal negation. Anyone who believes Unicorns, also believes Centaurs. You don’t believe Unicorns. Thus, you don’t believe Centaurs.

  4. Weak Premise Match / Weak Conclusion Match23% picked this

    Anyone who believes in unicorns believes in centaurs. But there is no good reason to believe in centaurs, so a belief in

    This does try to argue by contrapositive, and it does shift between belief and actuality, it’s using a different standard: whether there is/isn’t good reason for belief, whether a belief is/isn’t justified. The standards of the original argument were more black and white (refuted, false) Anyone who believes Unicorns, also believes Centaurs. No good evidence for Centaurs. Thus, no good evidence for Unicorns.

  5. Bad Premise Match / Bad Conclusion Match23% picked this

    Anyone who believes in unicorns believes in centaurs. But it has been conclusively proven that there is no such thing as a unicorn, so

    This doesn’t argue by contrapositive, it argues by illegal negation. Anyone who believes Unicorns, also believes Centaurs. Unicorns don’t exist. Thus, Centaurs don’t exist.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free