Reading Comprehension

PT133 · S4 · P3 · Q16 Ocean Floor Geologic Changes

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Until the 1950s, most scientists believed that the geology of the ocean floor had remained essentially unchanged for many millions of years.

Topic

The discovery and explanation of ocean floor spreading and the patterns of magnetic striping on the sea floor.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Until the 1950s, scientists believed the ocean floor was geologically unchanged for millions of years, but new discoveries—especially magnetic striping patterns and their alignment with Earth's historic magnetic reversals—revealed that the ocean floor is continually being renewed at mid-ocean ridges through a process called ocean floor spreading. ( – end of first paragraph, is the pivot sentence.)

P1: The Old Belief and the Puzzling New Discovery

Up until the 1950s, the consensus was that the ocean floor didn't really change. But when scientists started seeing weird magnetic differences in ocean floor rocks, they realized this old idea couldn't hold up. The explanation? As molten rock cools, its magnetic minerals lock in the direction of Earth's magnetic field, which has actually flipped many times in the past.

P2: Mapping the New Patterns and Formulating the New Theory

As researchers mapped more of the ocean floor, they saw clear patterns of alternating stripes with normal and reversed magnetic polarity centered on mid-ocean ridges—a network of underwater mountains. Scientists proposed the new idea of "ocean floor spreading": new crust forms at these ridges and slowly moves away, creating the striped pattern and gradually building the ridge.

P3: Evidence Supporting Ocean Floor Spreading

Several pieces of evidence supported ocean floor spreading: rocks at the ridge crest are very young and get older farther away, the youngest rocks all have normal polarity, and the ages of the stripes match documented reversals in Earth’s magnetic field—showing a striking correlation that backs up the spreading theory.

16.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main idea of the passage?

  1. In the 1950s, scientists refined

    Too Specific

    Too Specific: in the 1950's Out of Scope: how ocean floor formed Most scientists believed the OLD idea until the 1950s, but the passage isn't precise with the timeline of when "new discoveries were made". More importantly, the passage is not talking about how the ocean floor was formed many millions of years ago. It's talking about the process by which the mid-ocean ridge was formed over the last few million years.

    9% picked this

  2. The discovery of basalt's magnetic

    Too Specific: basalt Contradicted: discovery

    Basalt played a very supporting role in this passage. There's no reason to elevate it to the headline, especially when we learned about other discoveries like the magnetic striping on the ocean floor that were just as important. Also the scientists didn't discover basalt's magnetic properties in the 1950s ... it was known that basalt contains magnetite, a strongly magnetic material.

    19% picked this

  3. Correct

    In the 1950s, two significant

    Why this is right

    This sounds a lot like the language from the first two sentences. Two significant discoveries - ocean floor has odd magnetic variations (paragraph 1) - holy crap, there's a global mid-ocean ridge! (paragraph 2) Transformation of scientific views - old: geology of ocean floor hasn't changed for millions of years - new: geology has been continually changing via ocean floor spreading

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    66% picked this

  4. Local distortions to compass readings

    Too Narrow

    This is way, way, way too narrow. It's referring to a line in the first paragraph that was such an extraneous aside that they set it off with double dashes.

    1% picked this

  5. The discovery of the ocean

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: convinced of need to map There was no causal relationship posed between discovering the magnetic variations on the ocean floor and the mapping of the ocean floor. This makes a very strong claim that discovering the variations convinced scientists of the need to map. That's enough to disqualify this answer, but it also fails to mention the headline of the whole passage: once we found the variations and the mid-ocean ridge, we realized the ocean floor has been spreading this whole time!

    5% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free