Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT133 S2 Q19 Explanation

Style manual: Archaic spellings

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Style manual: Archaic spellings and styles of punctuation in direct quotations from older works are to be preserved if they occur infrequently and do not interfere with a reader's comprehension. However, if they occur frequently, the editor may modernize them, inserting a note with an explanation to this effect in the text, hand, obvious typographical errors in quotations from modern works may be corrected without explanation.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

Which one of the following follows logically from the

Answer choices

  1. Contradiction2% picked this

    If an editor corrects the spelling of a quoted word and the word occurs only once in the text, then an explanation should appear

    The third statement indicates that spelling may be corrected without explanation.

  2. Contradiction12% picked this

    An editor may modernize an archaic spelling of a word found in a modern work

    From the first and second statements the editor should preserve the archaic spelling of a quoted word or provide an explanation if it is modernized.

  3. Negation11% picked this

    An editor should modernize an archaic spelling of a word that is quoted from an older work if the

    This negates the first statement. ~F + IRC → ~P

  4. Correct70% picked this

    An editor may modernize punctuation directly quoted from an older work if that punctuation occurs frequently and

    Why this is right

    This answer provides more F + IRC → MM than enough information to trigger the second statement.

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Too Strong5% picked this

    If an editor modernizes only one of several similar instances of quoted archaic punctuation, an explanation should appear in

    The second part of the second statement implies that if such modernizing has been done in more than one quotation, a statement in the preface should be included. But to say that is true if such modernizing has been done in only one of several similar instances goes beyond what can be inferred.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free