Logical Reasoning

PT133 · S2 · Q12 Commentator: Recently, articles criticizing

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Commentator: Recently, articles criticizing the environmental movement have been appearing regularly in newspapers.

Given

Recently, articles criticizing the environmental movement have been appearing regularly in newspapers.

According to Winslow, this is due not so much to an antienvironmental bias among the media as to a preference on the part of newspaper editors for articles that seem “daring” in that they seem to challenge prevailing political positions.

It is true that editors like to run antienvironmental pieces mainly because they seem to challenge the political orthodoxy.

But serious environmentalism is by no means politically orthodox, and antienvironmentalists can hardly claim to be dissidents, however much they may have succeeded in selling themselves as renegades.

12.

The commentator's statements, if true, most strongly support which one of the following?

  1. Correct

    Winslow is correct about the

    Why this is right

    This is supported by the second and third statements.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    49% picked this

  2. Critics of environmentalism have not

    Contradiction

    The fourth statement undermines this answer.

    11% picked this

  3. Winslow's explanation is not consonant

    Contradiction

    This is undermined by the first, second, and third statements. Winslow’s explanation is consonant with the frequency since Winslow is correct about the editors’ preference for articles that seem daring and antienvironmental articles have been appearing regularly.

    16% picked this

  4. The position attacked by critics

    Contradiction

    The fourth statement undermines this answer.

    23% picked this

  5. Serious environmentalism will eventually become

    Speculation

    The statements do not make any predictions.

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free