Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT133 S1 Q18 Explanation

Principle: Even if an art auction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Strengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Principle: Even if an art auction house identifies the descriptions in its catalog as opinions, it is guilty of misrepresentation if such a attempt to mislead bidders.

Application: Although Healy's, an art auction house, states that all descriptions in its catalog are opinions, Healy's was guilty of misrepresentation when its catalog described a vase as dating it was actually a modern reproduction.

What this question is testing

Principle-Strengthen

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
18.

Which one of the following, if true, most justifies the above application

Answer choices

  1. Doesn't Establish Intent11% picked this

    An authentic work of art from the mid-eighteenth century will usually sell for at least ten times more than a modern reproduction of

    This definitely establishes a motive to mislead (since Healy's could sell an 18th century vase for more than a modern copy), but we still don't know if this description was an honest mistake or a deliberate distortion.

  2. Doesn't Establish Intent1% picked this

    Although pottery that is similar to the vase is currently extremely popular among art collectors, none of the collectors who are knowledgeable about such

    This has nothing to do with whether Healy's intentionally wrote the wrong description.

  3. Doesn't Establish Intent2% picked this

    The stated policy of Healy's is to describe works in its catalogs only in terms of their readily perceptible qualities and not to

    We would now know that this description (by naming age information) goes against Healy's stated policies, but we still don't know if it was intended to mislead.

  4. Doesn't Establish Intent1% picked this

    Some Healy's staff members believe that the auction house's catalog should not contain any descriptions that have not been certified to

    This doesn't give us anything that sounds like "the people who wrote the description intentionally wanted to mislead".

  5. Correct85% picked this

    Without consulting anyone with expertise in authenticating vases, Healy's described the vase as dating from the mid-eighteenth century merely in order

    Why this is right

    While far from perfect, this answer does more than any other to establish an intent to mislead: "Healy's didn't consult any experts; they instead just described the vase as 18th century in order to increase its auction price". We needed to establish that this description was done with the intent of misleading bidders. in order to = intent increase its auction price = affect bidders

    Skill tested: Principle-Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free