Logical Reasoning

PT132 · S4 · Q5 Researchers announced recently that

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Researchers announced recently that over the past 25 years the incidence of skin cancer caused by exposure to harmful rays from the sun has continued to grow in spite of the increasingly widespread use of sunscreens.

Conclusion

Using sunscreen is unlikely to reduce your risk of skin cancer.

Evidence

Over the past 25 years, more and more people are using sunscreen, but the incidence of skin cancer caused by harmful sun rays has continued to go up.

Evaluation

Anti-causal arguments such as these can be weakened by showing an important difference between the two groups / cases being compared.

The group 25 years ago used less sunscreen, but had a lower incidence of skin cancer than the group nowadays. But maybe something else is different about them that preserves our ability to think that sunscreen is actually effective.

Maybe the sun's rays are more harmful now (bigger holes in the ozone layer?), so we'd expect 50% more skin cancer, but because of sunscreen's effectiveness it's only 20% more skin cancer.

Maybe people are spending way more time in the sun, so we'd expect 50% more skin cancer, but sunscreen is keeping it down to only 20% more.

Maybe people don't put on sunscreen as frequently / effectively as they used to.

Goal

In order for us to argue that sunscreen does reduce your risk of skin cancer, we need a way to make an excuse for the fact that the incidence of skin cancer is rising. So we need something that makes today's sunscreen wearers more likely to be getting skin cancer than their counterparts from 25 years ago.

5.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?

  1. Most people who purchase a

    Out of Scope

    This doesn't present any difference between sunscreen users Then and Now, and there's no common sense link between most expensive brand and most effective brand.

    0% picked this

  2. Correct

    Skin cancer generally develops among

    Why this is right

    This didn't weaken in the typical way, but it gives us a way to make an excuse for why the incidence of sunscreen is rising --- the people getting cancer now are being "punished" for their lack of sunscreen 25+ years ago (the gap between very old and very young). The people nowadays who are using sunscreen more will not have as high an incidence of skin cancer when they get very old (25+ years from now). Basically, skin cancer is a lagging indicator of how much sunscreen people are using. It's like looking at a star in the sky. You don't see it as it is; you see it as it was.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    67% picked this

  3. The development of sunscreens by

    No Impact

    This doesn't offer any difference between Then and Now. The fact that sunscreens were developed by medical companies and doctors doesn't give strong evidence that sunscreens work against skin cancer (maybe they were designed only to protect against sunburn).

    2% picked this

  4. People who know that they

    Opposite

    If we had an answer that said, "Increasingly, people who are susceptible to skin cancer are inclined to spend a large amount of time in the sun", then that could have provided an alternate explanation for why the incidence of skin cancer is going up (so that we wouldn't have to think that sunscreens were ineffective).

    5% picked this

  5. Those who use sunscreens most

    Opposite

    If an answer said, "Increasingly, over the past 25 years, the people who are most susceptible to skin cancer are the ones least likely to use sunscreen", that could have given us an alternate way to explain why skin cancer was going up (without having to blame sunscreen for being ineffective)

    26% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free