Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT132 S4 Q1 Explanation

Marine biologist: Scientists have long

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Marine biologist: Scientists have long wondered why the fish that live around coral reefs exhibit such brilliant colors. One suggestion is that coral reefs are colorful and, therefore, that colorful fish are camouflaged by them. Many animal species, after all, use camouflage to avoid predators. However, as regards the populations around reefs, monochromatic. Most corals, it turns out, are relatively dull browns and greens.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
1.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion drawn in the

Answer choices

  1. Opposing Point2% picked this

    One hypothesis about why fish living near coral reefs exhibit such bright colors is that the fish are

    This is the point the argument sets out to challenge.

  2. Opposing Assumption1% picked this

    The fact that many species use camouflage to avoid predators is one reason to believe that brightly colored fish

    This is an assumption of the opposing argument.

  3. Correct93% picked this

    The suggestion that the fish living around coral reefs exhibit bright colors because they are camouflaged by

    Why this is right

    This best paraphrases the marine biologist’s main point.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Intermediate Conclusion3% picked this

    A reef stripped of its fish is

    This is an intermediate conclusion, meaning that it is supported by a premise and supports the main point.

  5. Premise2% picked this

    It turns out that the corals in a coral reef are mostly dull hues of

    This is a premise of the marine biologist’s argument.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free