Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT132 S1 P3 Q17 Explanation

Dental Caries

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A Because dental caries (decay) is strongly linked to consumption of the sticky, carbohydrate-rich staples of agricultural diets, prehistoric human teeth can provide clues about when a population made the transition from a hunter-gatherer diet to an agricultural one. Caries formation is influenced by several factors, including tooth structure, bacteria in carbohydrates’ texture and composition, since carbohydrates more readily stick to teeth.

Many researchers have demonstrated the link between carbohydrate consumption and caries. In North America, Leigh studied caries in archaeologically derived teeth, noting that caries rates differed between indigenous populations that primarily consumed meat (a Sioux sample showed almost no caries) and those heavily dependent on cultivated maize (a Zuni sample had 75 dependence on agriculture is, the higher its rate of caries formation will be.

Under some circumstances, however, nonagricultural populations may exhibit relatively high caries rates. For example, early nonagricultural populations in western North America who consumed large amounts of highly processed stone-ground flour made from gathered acorns show relatively high caries frequencies. And wild plants collected cariogenic potential, notably pinyon nuts and wild tubers.

Passage B Archaeologists recovered human skeletal remains interred over a 2,000-year period in prehistoric Ban Chiang, Thailand. The site’s early inhabitants appear to have had a hunter-gatherer-cultivator economy. Evidence population became increasingly dependent on agriculture.

Research suggests that agricultural intensification results in declining human health, including dental health. Studies show that dental caries is uncommon in pre-agricultural populations. Increased caries frequency may result from increased consumption of starchy-sticky foodstuffs or from alterations in tooth wear. The wearing down of tooth crown surfaces reduces caries formation by removing However, severe wear that exposes a tooth’s pulp cavity may also result in caries.

The diet of Ban Chiang’s inhabitants included some cultivated rice and yams from the beginning of the period represented by the recovered remains. These were part of a varied diet that also included wild plant and animal foods. Since both rice and or both should theoretically result in increased caries frequency.

Yet comparisons of caries frequency in the Early and Late Ban Chiang Groups indicate that overall caries frequency is slightly greater in the Early Group. Tooth wear patterns do not indicate tooth wear changes between Early and Late Groups that would explain this unexpected finding. It is more likely that, although dependence been a shift from sweeter carbohydrates (yams) toward rice, a less cariogenic carbohydrate.

What this question is testing

Inference

Topic

The author of each passage is examining a long-running idea: that switching to agriculture (with all its carbohydrates) is bad for your teeth. Passage A reviews the evidence; Passage B looks at a site that doesn't fit the pattern.

Framework

Dual Passage.

Main Point

The simpler version: in general, when populations shift from hunting and gathering to farming, they get more cavities — sticky carb-heavy foods are bad for teeth. But it's not absolute. Passage A flags some hunter-gatherer populations who got plenty of cavities anyway (acorn flour, pinyon nuts). Passage B looks at Ban Chiang, where you'd expect cavities to rise as agriculture rose — but they actually went slightly down. The likely reasons: the diet stayed varied (no one food took over), and people seem to have shifted from yams (sticky and sweet) toward rice (less so).

Passage A: The general rule and its exceptions

Cavity rates correlate with carb-heavy agricultural diets. Leigh's comparison: meat-eating Sioux had almost no cavities, maize-eating Zuni had 75%. But some hunter-gatherers ate stuff that caused plenty of cavities anyway — like processed acorn flour and pinyon nuts.

Passage B: A site that doesn't fit

Ban Chiang in Thailand transitioned from a mixed economy toward more agriculture over 2,000 years. Theory says cavities should have risen. They actually fell slightly. Tooth-wear can't explain it. The best guesses: the diet stayed varied (not dominated by sticky carbs), and the carb mix shifted from yams (more cavity-causing) to rice (less so).

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

Passage B most strongly supports which one of the following statements about fiber and grit

Answer choices

  1. Correct79% picked this

    They can either limit or promote caries formation, depending on their prevalence

    Why this is right

    This probably isn't super tempting on a first look. The idea that fiber/grit can promote caries formation is in line with what we researched. A reduction of fiber/grit in a diet increases (i.e. promotes) caries frequency So if the prevalence of fiber/grit in a diet is low, it can promote caries formation. But we can seemingly flip this upside down to get the other part of this answer. If we have a high prevalence of fiber/grit in the diet, then we will wear down tooth crown surfaces, removing fissures that can trap food particles, thereby limiting caries formation.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Out of Support Window: agriculture2% picked this

    They are typically consumed in greater quantities as a population

    There's nothing about "agriculture" connected to what we're told about fiber and grit. This is just attempting a Word Salad where they toss together different concepts that appeared in different parts of the passage. This also goes against common sense. Agriculture gives us starchy-sticky stuff like rice and yams, which are not very fibrous or gritty. Eating nuts and meat (a pre-agricultural diet) would likely involve more fiber and grit.

  3. Too Strong: no value / negative overall1% picked this

    They have a negative effect on overall health since they have

    We know so little about "fiber and grit", and it's all contained in the second half of B's 2nd paragraph. It doesn't say anything there like "fiber and grit have no nutritional value" or "have a negative effect on overall health". The one thing we learn about fiber and grit is that having them in your diet helps to prevent caries formation.

  4. Opposite17% picked this

    They contribute to the formation of fissures in

    Fiber and grit contribute to tooth wear, and the wearing down of tooth crown surfaces removes fissures.

  5. Unsupported Causal Claim: increase sticky2% picked this

    They increase the stickiness of carbohydrate-rich

    This is another Word Salad type of answer, grabbing "sticky" from earlier in the paragraph and "carbohydrate-rich foods" from the 3rd paragraph. Nothing in our very tiny window of supporting text suggests that fiber and grit increase stickiness.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free