Reading Comprehension

PT132 · S1 · P2 · Q9 Medical Illustrations

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

While courts have long allowed custom-made medical illustrations depicting personal injury to be presented as evidence in legal cases, the issue of whether they have a legitimate place in the courtroom is surrounded by ongoing debate and misinformation.

Topic

Custom-made medical illustrations as courtroom evidence—debates, misconceptions, and their value.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Despite criticism and misconceptions, custom-made medical illustrations have a legitimate and valuable place in courtrooms, as they provide clear, focused visuals that help judges and juries understand complex medical evidence. (P2) (P4)

P1: Introduction to the Debate and Common Objection

There's an ongoing debate about whether custom medical illustrations should be used as evidence in court. Some critics argue they're usually unnecessary because textbook illustrations can show most injuries just fine.

P2: Skepticism about Accuracy and Legal Safeguards

Another complaint is that custom illustrations can be misleading or used to push a weak legal case. However, the passage clarifies that such illustrations must be verified by expert witnesses to be admitted in court, so misleading illustrations alone are not a real danger.

P3: Concerns about Subtle Manipulation and the Role of Objectivity

People also worry that even technically accurate illustrations could subtly sway opinions through visual tricks. The author counters that professional illustrators strive for objectivity and tailor illustrations to only show legally relevant details, streamlining information rather than overloading or manipulating the audience.

9.

Which one of the following is most analogous to the role that, according to the author, custom-made medical illustrations play in personal injury cases?

  1. Correct

    schematic drawings accompanying an engineer's

    Why this is right

    This doesn't give us much to work with, but in the sense that it's a visual aid accompanying a technical oral presentation, it matches up with the idea of having a visual aid as an expert witness is giving technical oral testimony. It's surprising there's not more "meat on these bones" to match up with the passage, but it's our best available match.

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    69% picked this

  2. road maps used by people

    Bad Match: avoiding simpler option

    In this example, the visual aid (the road map) isn't used to supplement someone's understanding of technical verbal stuff. It's used to avoid getting verbal stuff in the first place. Also, a road map actually has way too much detail, whereas verbal instructions from strangers would be the simplified / stripped-down to only what you need to know option. So this is cross-matched. The verbal directions from strangers are more like the custom-visual illustrations. The road map is more like the overly complicated medical textbook illustration.

    26% picked this

  3. children's drawings that psychologists use

    Bad Match: hidden information

    In this example, the visual aid is there to unlock information that wouldn't be contained in the other source of info (the child's behavior). In the courtroom, the custom illustration isn't a visual aid meant to unlock new information that wouldn't be contained in the expert witness's testimony or that wouldn't be contained in the medical textbook illustration. Instead, it's meant to eliminate unnecessary extra-information and give someone a non-technical way of understanding partly in visual terms.

    3% picked this

  4. a reproduction of a famous

    Weak Match: exact copy

    The visual aid in this answer is just a smaller picture of an actual thing. Rather than just talking about the Mona Lisa, they also show a 3x5 inch picture of the Mona Lisa. Custom courtroom illustrations aren't small copies of an actual visual item. They are simplified versions of reality that allow someone to get a mental picture of what's being talked about. If an art history textbook was discussing a painting using highly technical terminology, then providing an illustration or a picture of the painting could certainly help people with getting a better mental picture than the verbal description provided. But this lacks the similarity (A) has that the illustration would be a custom-created image meant to simplify. A schematic drawing is "symbolic and simplified". A picture of the Mona Lisa is not symbolic or simplified. It's just shrunken.

    1% picked this

  5. an artist's preliminary sketches for

    Bad Match: preliminary

    An artist's preliminary sketch is a warm-up for the real thing. A custom illustration for a trial is not a warm-up for the real thing. It's a way to help people get a mental picture of a complicated medical explanation. An artist's preliminary sketches also probably aren't meant to even be seen by anyone but the artist, whereas a custom courtroom illustration is meant to be seen by the judge and jury.

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free