Reading Comprehension

PT132 · S1 · P2 · Q11 Medical Illustrations

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

While courts have long allowed custom-made medical illustrations depicting personal injury to be presented as evidence in legal cases, the issue of whether they have a legitimate place in the courtroom is surrounded by ongoing debate and misinformation.

Topic

Custom-made medical illustrations as courtroom evidence—debates, misconceptions, and their value.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Despite criticism and misconceptions, custom-made medical illustrations have a legitimate and valuable place in courtrooms, as they provide clear, focused visuals that help judges and juries understand complex medical evidence. (P2) (P4)

P1: Introduction to the Debate and Common Objection

There's an ongoing debate about whether custom medical illustrations should be used as evidence in court. Some critics argue they're usually unnecessary because textbook illustrations can show most injuries just fine.

P2: Skepticism about Accuracy and Legal Safeguards

Another complaint is that custom illustrations can be misleading or used to push a weak legal case. However, the passage clarifies that such illustrations must be verified by expert witnesses to be admitted in court, so misleading illustrations alone are not a real danger.

P3: Concerns about Subtle Manipulation and the Role of Objectivity

People also worry that even technically accurate illustrations could subtly sway opinions through visual tricks. The author counters that professional illustrators strive for objectivity and tailor illustrations to only show legally relevant details, streamlining information rather than overloading or manipulating the audience.

11.

The passage states that a role of medical experts in relation to custom-made medical illustrations in the courtroom is to

  1. decide which custom-made medical illustrations

    Too Strong: decide

    This is purposefully put in slot (A), because it's so close to what we were looking for. But doesn't the judge ultimately decide what is admissible? The role of the expert is to testify as to whether or not the illustration is accurate. The judge takes that testimony into account when deciding whether the illustration should be admissible.

    10% picked this

  2. temper the impact of the

    Trap

    Unrelated to Goal Out of Scope: temper the impact This has nothing to do with attesting to accuracy in order to determine admissibility, so we don't want to give it much of a close read. If we did, it's saying something pretty counterintuitive. When medical experts testify, they use such complex technical jargon that it often overwhelms the non-expert judge and jurors. So custom illustrations, the author argues, can temper the impact / soften the landing / make the technical stuff go down easier. Thus, this answer is pretty opposite of reality.

    3% picked this

  3. make medical illustrations understandable to

    Trap

    Unrelated to Goal Out of Scope: temper the impact This is really the same as (B). First of all, it doesn't in any way match our target sentence at the end of the 2nd paragraph. Secondly, it's saying the same counterintuitive idea that "the EXPERTS help to make stuff understandable". Meanwhile, the passage was saying, "Since the experts' testimony is confusing, the illustration helps make their testimony understandable."

    14% picked this

  4. provide opinions to attorneys as

    Trap

    Unrelated to Goal Out of Scope: provide opinions This doesn't match our target sentence at the end of the 2nd paragraph, so we shouldn't think about it too much. If we do read it closer, it's saying something out of scope. The passage never discussed experts passing opinions to attorneys about which illustrations to use.

    1% picked this

  5. Correct

    provide their opinions as to

    Why this is right

    This matches the detail we're asked about, at the end of the 2nd paragraph. [Custom] illustrations [are] inadmissible as evidence in the courtroom unless a medical expert is present to testify to their accuracy.

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    73% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free