Reading Comprehension

PT131 · S4 · P3 · Q18 Sculptor Isamu Noguchi

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The Japanese American sculptor Isamu Noguchi (1904-1988) was an artist who intuitively asked—and responded to—deeply original questions.

Topic

Isamu Noguchi's creative process — using a "scientist's mind" to reframe a fundamental sculptural problem and create a new kind of "positive-light" sculpture using chrome-nickel steel.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy. The author celebrates Noguchi's habit of asking deeply original questions and tells the story behind one particular sculpture as typical of his creativeness.

Main Point

Noguchi's defining trait was an inquisitive scientist's mind that pushed him to ask deeply original questions about sculpture itself — questions that led him to invent a new genre of "positive-light" reflective sculpture, after which he kept moving on to the next phase rather than settling into a style.

P1: Noguchi as a question-asker

Noguchi was an artist who intuitively asked deeply original questions. He could have been a scientist; instead he became an artist who veered off at wide angles from conventionally talented artists. The story behind one sculpture typifies his creativeness.

P2: Apprenticeship with Brancusi and the negative-light realization

By his early twenties, Noguchi won a Guggenheim and went to Paris in 1927. After Brancusi declined to take him as a student, Noguchi became Brancusi's stonecutter, also polishing Brancusi's brass and bronze. With his "scientist's mind," Noguchi recognized that sculptors had always relied on negative light (shadows) because no metal except expensive gold gave reliable positive-light reflections.

P3: The breakthrough — Fuller and chrome-nickel steel

Noguchi wanted to create a purely reflective sculpture. After returning to the U.S. in 1929, he met R. Buckminster Fuller and offered to sculpt his portrait. Fuller suggested chrome-nickel steel — newly available commercially via Henry Ford's research and development. Here was a permanently reflective surface, available economically in massive quantities.

18.

The passage offers the strongest evidence that the author would agree with which one of the following statements?

  1. Noguchi's work in Paris contributed

    Too Strong

    We have no evidence that Noguchi's work in polishing Brancusi's stones contributed significantly to sculpture. Noguchi's influential sculpture doesn't happen until he gets back to the U.S. Also, the passage doesn't say Brancusi (or other sculptors) were trying unsuccessfully to overcome the negative-light limitation.

    3% picked this

  2. Noguchi's scientific approach to designing

    Out of Scope

    The passage doesn't mention whether Noguchi had formal scientific training. The phrase "scientist's mind" describes a habit of inquisitive questioning, not a comment on his education.

    11% picked this

  3. Despite the fact that Brancusi

    Wrong View

    The passage gives Brancusi the role of letting Noguchi see what previous sculptors had been doing. Noguchi, with his scientist's mind, "pondered the fact that sculptors through the ages had relied exclusively upon negative light" while polishing Brancusi's sculptures. Fuller's contribution was the material (chrome-nickel steel), not helping Noguchi realize what previous sculptors had been doing. This is basically flipping who deserves more credit.

    4% picked this

  4. Correct

    Noguchi was more interested in

    Why this is right

    The passage emphasizes that Noguchi asked "deeply original questions" and "veered off at wide angles" from conventional artists. That suggests someone who is asking fundamental aesthetic questions: "why have sculptors always relied on negative light?" We also know that Noguchi kept proceeding to "the next phase of his evolution", rather than repeating the same style that made him famous. When we know that person DID do X and DIDN'T do Y, then we can support some comparative idea like, "The person cared more about X than about Y."

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    60% picked this

  5. Noguchi's work is of special

    Wrong View

    Out of Scope (aesthetic approach to science) The passage discusses scientific thinking applied to art (Noguchi's "scientist's mind" examining sculpture's history), not aesthetic approaches applied to scientific inquiry. The reverse direction, what art could teach science, isn't something the passage develops.

    22% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free