Logical Reasoning

PT131 · S3 · Q19 If understanding a word always

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

If understanding a word always involves knowing its dictionary definition, then understanding a word requires understanding the words that occur in that definition.

Given

If understanding a (UW → KD) → (UW → UWD) word always involves knowing its dictionary definition, then understanding a word requires understanding the words that occur in that definition.

But clearly there are B → ~KD people—for example, all babies—who do not know the dictionary definitions of some of the words they utter.

19.

Which one of the following statements follows logically from the statements above?

  1. Some babies utter individual words

    Unsupported Relationship

    This assumes that B ↢some↣ ~UW (UW → KD) is true. Since it is not known whether it is true, that babies do not know the dictionary definitions of some of the words they utter does not establish that babies do not understand some of the words that they utter.

    37% picked this

  2. Any number of people can

    Unsupported Relationship

    This would be UW → KD implied if it were known that (UW → UWD) is not true.

    6% picked this

  3. If some words can be

    Too Strong

    If some words can be understood without knowing their dictionary definition, then it could be that babies understand some words, but to say that babies do understand some words goes too far.

    9% picked this

  4. If it is possible to

    Negation

    This negates the (UW → KD) → (UW → UWD) first statement.

    8% picked this

  5. Correct

    If some babies understand all

    Why this is right

    Babies do not know the B ↢some↣ ~KD dictionary definitions of some of the words they utter. Babies understand all B → UW of the words they utter. Together, these two statements establish that understanding doesn't require knowing the dictionary definition, because together they would show that babies can understand even though they don't know dictionary definitions.

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    40% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free