Logical Reasoning

PT131 · S2 · Q19 At a gathering at which bankers, athletes, and lawyers

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

At a gathering at which bankers, athletes, and lawyers are present, all of the bankers are athletes and none of the lawyers are bankers.

Given

All of the bankers are B → A athletes.

None of the lawyers are L → ~B bankers.

Some bankers are present (they are also athletes).

Some athletes are present.

Some lawyers are present (they aren't bankers).

19.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following statements must also be true?

  1. All of the athletes are

    Reversal

    This reverses the first premise.

    2% picked this

  2. Some of the lawyers are

    Unsupported Relationship

    We know that all the lawyers are not bankers, but that's it. We don't have any way to judge whether any of them are athletes or not. We weren't given any information about whether non-bankers are athletes, non-athletes, or both.

    12% picked this

  3. Correct

    Some of the athletes are

    Why this is right

    All of the bankers are B → A athletes. None of the bankers B → ~L are lawyers (contrapositive). So, some of the athletes ∴ A ↢some↣ ~L are not lawyers. In less diagrammed form, say that Steve is at this party and he's a banker. In virtue of him being a banker, we know that he IS an athlete and ISN'T a lawyer. So since there are bankers at the party, there has to be at least one person who is both an athlete and a non-lawyer.

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    61% picked this

  4. All of the bankers are

    Contradiction

    The second premise implies B → L that no bankers are lawyers, while this contradicts that premise.

    1% picked this

  5. None of the lawyers are

    Too Strong

    It can be inferred that A ↢some↣ ~L some athletes are not lawyers. It cannot be inferred A → ~L that no athletes are lawyers. Or the contrapositive. L → ~A

    24% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free