Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT131 S2 Q11 Explanation

Medical research has established

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Medical research has established that the Beta Diet is healthier than a more conventional diet. But on average, people who have followed the Beta Diet for several decades are much more likely to people whose diet is more conventional.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict between the

Answer choices

  1. Opposite Heightens the Surprise3% picked this

    On average, people who have followed the Beta Diet for their entire lives are much more likely to have a variety of healthful habits

    This doesn't explain why Beta dieters are in poorer health. It makes it seem even more like Beta dieters should be in better health. Had this been flipped and said "much less likely", it would have worked as a correct answer.

  2. Correct90% picked this

    The Beta Diet is used primarily as a treatment for a condition that adversely

    Why this is right

    Beta dieters are in poorer health because first they get in poor health (they suffer from a condition that adversely affects overall health), then they get put by a doctor on onto the Beta Diet. The Beta diet isn't causing them to be in poorer health. Being in poor health is causing them to be on the Beta Diet.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Supports Background Heightens Surprise1% picked this

    People of average health who switch from a conventional diet to the Beta Diet generally find that their health

    This doesn't help us explain why Beta dieters are in poorer health. In this answer, the people who go onto a Beta diet see their health improve a lot.

  4. Too Weak5% picked this

    The Beta Diet provides dramatic health benefits for some people but only minor

    This doesn't help us explain why people on Beta dieters are in poorer health. It says that some people on it only get modest benefit (not the large benefit that others get). But all of those people are still benefiting. No one is being harmed, so how are they in poorer health?

  5. Out of Scope1% picked this

    Recent research has shown that a diet high in fruits, vegetables, and skim milk is even healthier

    Out of Scope: "healthier than Beta Diet" We know that Beta is a healthy diet. Healthier than average. It doesn't matter for this paradox whether Beta is #1 ranked healthiest, #2, etc. It just needs to be healthier than average, because the paradox is that its users tend to be less healthy than average.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free