Logical Reasoning

PT131 · S1 · Q9 Philosopher: An action is morally

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Philosopher: An action is morally good if it both achieves the agent's intended goal and benefits someone other than the agent.

Given

An action is morally good if it both AIG + BSO → MG achieves the agent’s intended goal and benefits someone other than the agent.

9.

Which one of the following judgments most closely conforms to the principle cited by the philosopher?

  1. Colin chose to lie to

    Unsupported Relationship / Out of Scope

    This argument concludes that the MG action was morally good. And this matches the necessary condition in the principle. But it doesn’t offer the sufficient conditions from the principle as support. This action fails to achieve its goal and it failed to benefit someone other than the giver. Furthermore, love is not within the scope of the principle.

    1% picked this

  2. Derek prepared a steak dinner

    Negation

    This argument concludes that the ~MG action was not morally good and negates the necessary condition in the principle.

    3% picked this

  3. Ellen worked overtime hoping to

    Too Weak

    This argument does not meet both ~AIG + BSO sufficient conditions. While the action did benefit someone other than the giver, it did not achieve its intended goal.

    1% picked this

  4. Louisa tried to get Henry

    Negation

    This argument concludes that the ~MG action was not morally good and negates the necessary condition in the principle.

    3% picked this

  5. Correct

    Yolanda took her children to

    Why this is right

    This argument concludes that MG the action was morally good. And this matches the necessary condition in the principle. And the argument offers as AIG + BSO support the two sufficient conditions: an action that achieved its goal and benefited someone other than the giver.

    Skill tested: Principle-Conform · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    92% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free