Anyone who believes in democracy has a high regard for the wisdom of the masses. Griley, however, is an elitist who believes that any artwork that is popular is Griley does not believe in democracy.
What this question is testing
Argument
The author wants to get from "Griley thinks popular art is bad" to "Griley doesn't believe in democracy."
The bridge: believing in democracy = high regard for the masses. Contrapositive: not having high regard for the masses = not believing in democracy.
Evaluate
So if we can establish that Griley's art belief means he doesn't have high regard for the masses, the conclusion follows.
Think of it as a chain: Griley's belief -> ?? -> no high regard -> doesn't believe in democracy. We need to fill in the missing middle link: anyone who believes popular art is bad doesn't have high regard for the masses.
Goal
An answer that says: thinking popular art is unlikely to be good means not having a high regard for the wisdom of the masses.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.