Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT130 S4 Q19 Explanation

Anyone who believes in democracy

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Anyone who believes in democracy has a high regard for the wisdom of the masses. Griley, however, is an elitist who believes that any artwork that is popular is Griley does not believe in democracy.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Argument

The author wants to get from "Griley thinks popular art is bad" to "Griley doesn't believe in democracy."

The bridge: believing in democracy = high regard for the masses. Contrapositive: not having high regard for the masses = not believing in democracy.

Evaluate

So if we can establish that Griley's art belief means he doesn't have high regard for the masses, the conclusion follows.

Think of it as a chain: Griley's belief -> ?? -> no high regard -> doesn't believe in democracy. We need to fill in the missing middle link: anyone who believes popular art is bad doesn't have high regard for the masses.

Goal

An answer that says: thinking popular art is unlikely to be good means not having a high regard for the wisdom of the masses.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

The conclusion follows logically if which one of the following

Answer choices

  1. Reversal1% picked this

    Anyone who believes that an artwork is unlikely to be good if it is popular

    This says: thinks popular art is bad -> elitist. The argument already calls Griley an elitist. The needed bridge goes from Griley's art belief to NOT having high regard for the masses, not to "elitist." This connection doesn't complete the chain.

  2. Correct80% picked this

    Anyone who believes that if an artwork is popular it is unlikely to be good does not have a high regard for

    Why this is right

    This is the bridge. It says: anyone who thinks popular art is unlikely to be good does NOT have a high regard for the wisdom of the masses. Apply this to Griley (who has that belief): Griley does not have a high regard for the masses. Combined with the first premise (believing in democracy requires high regard), we get the contrapositive: Griley does not believe in democracy. Conclusion guaranteed.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Reversal2% picked this

    If Griley is not an elitist, then he has a high regard for the wisdom

    This says: not elitist -> high regard. We'd need to combine that with the first premise (high regard

  4. Too Strong10% picked this

    Anyone who does not have a high regard for the wisdom of the masses is an elitist who believes that if an artwork is

    This says: no high regard for the masses -> elitist who thinks popular art is bad. That's the wrong direction — the argument needs us to derive "no high regard" from Griley's art belief, not the reverse. And the answer is much stronger than needed: it requires that anyone lacking high regard be both an elitist and hold the popular-art belief, which Griley already happens to be.

  5. Reversal7% picked this

    Unless Griley believes in democracy, Griley does not have a high regard for the wisdom

    This says: doesn't believe in democracy -> doesn't have high regard. That's the contrapositive of the first premise stated backward — useful when going from "no high regard" to "doesn't believe in democracy." But this version reverses it: "Unless he believes in democracy, he doesn't have high regard" works to derive the loss of regard from the conclusion, not the other way around. It doesn't bridge Griley's art belief to the conclusion.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free