Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT130 S3 Q21 Explanation

Doctor: Medication to reduce blood pressure

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsNecessary Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Doctor: Medication to reduce blood pressure often has unhealthy side effects. However, lifestyle changes such as exercising more and avoiding fatty foods reduce blood pressure just as effectively as taking medication does. Therefore, it is healthier than on medication to reduce blood pressure.

What this question is testing

Necessary Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.

Common trap

Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).

Winning move

Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

Which one of the following is an assumption that the doctor's

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: only3% picked this

    Other than medication, the only way to reduce blood pressure is by making lifestyle changes such as exercising

    Just because the author only mentioned these three ways doesn’t mean he’s assuming that they are the only three ways. I might want to argue that a Corolla is better than a Civic or a Maxima; in doing so, I don’t have to assume that those are the only three cars there are.

  2. Illegal Reversal11% picked this

    If it is healthier to rely on a lifestyle change than on medication to reduce blood pressure, then that lifestyle change reduces blood pressure

    When we see conditional answers, compare them to the core. Beware reversals/negations. The author’s premise to conclusion move is, “Since lifestyle reduces as much as medication does, it is healthier to rely on lifestyle”. This answer choice is a reversal of that idea.

  3. Correct74% picked this

    The side effects, if any, of exercising more and avoiding fatty foods in order to reduce blood pressure are less unhealthy than those of

    Why this is right

    We know that meds have side effects, but in order to judge that as a relative disadvantage compared to diet/exercise, we need to know that diet/exercise do not have side effects that are just as bad or worse. If we negated this answer, we would get the strong objection of “The side of effects of diet/exercise are at least as bad as the side effects of meds!”

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Strong: always11% picked this

    If an alternative to medication relieves a medical condition just as effectively as medication does, then it is always healthier to rely on that

    This general rule does seem to apply to the author’s thinking in this specific case. But how do we know whether she would apply this general rule to all cases. We know the author thinks that it is sometimes true that an equally effective alternative to medication is thus the healthier option. But she hasn’t committed herself to believing that this would always be true for any case.

  5. Bad Premise Match1% picked this

    If two different methods of treating a medical condition have similar side effects, then it is healthier to rely

    When we see conditional answers, compare them to the core. Did the argument go from “We know that diet/exercise has similar side effects to meds (but diet/exercise is more effective), thus the healthier option is diet/exercise?” Not at all. We have no idea whether diet/exercise has similar side effects. The argument said, “If two different methods have similar effectiveness and one of them has bad side effects, then it is healthier to rely on the other method.”

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free