Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT13 S4 Q7 Explanation

Murray: You claim Senator Brandon

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Murray: You claim Senator Brandon has accepted gifts from lobbyists. You are wrong to make this criticism. That it is motivated by personal dislike is shown by the fact that you deliberately avoid criticizing you accuse Senator Brandon of doing.

Jane: You are right that I dislike Senator Brandon, but just because I have not criticized the same failing in others excuse the senator’s offense.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

If Murray and Jane are both sincere in what they say, then it can properly be concluded that

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported by Murray11% picked this

    Senator Brandon has accepted gifts from

    We considered this idea in our evaluation. Murray has only said, "You claim Senator Brandon has accepted gifts". He never says anything that affirms that he thinks Senator B has in fact accepted gifts.

  2. Unsupported by Murray13% picked this

    it is wrong for politicians to accept gifts

    We can tell that Jane is bothered by the idea of accepting gifts from lobbyists (she thinks that her own inconsistency in criticizing people for this does not excuse the senator's offense). But we can't point to any wording where Murray affirms that it's wrong for politicians to accept gifts from lobbyists. We only know that he thinks it's wrong to be inconsistent in criticizing people for a certain behavior.

  3. Too Strong: only9% picked this

    Jane’s criticism of Senator Brandon is motivated only by

    Both parties agree that Jane is motivated at least somewhat by personal dislike. Neither party said anything strong enough to support that Jane is only motivated by personal dislike. It seems like she is motivated in part by thinking that accepting gifts from lobbyists is an offense. The fact that she dislikes Senator B makes it easier for her to speak out against him, but that doesn't mean the only reason she's criticizing him is that she dislikes him.

  4. Unsupported for Murray6% picked this

    Senator Brandon should be criticized for accepting gifts

    This is a blend of both (A) and (B). We would need to know that Murray thinks 1. Senator B did in fact accept gifts from lobbyists and 2. It's wrong to accept gifts from lobbyists As discussed with (A) and (B), we can't derive either of those views from Murray's statements.

  5. Correct62% picked this

    one or more politicians have accepted gifts

    Why this is right

    Haha, what an impossible answer to predict. It has very lovably weak, provable language. Imagine what it would mean to disagree with this statement! (No politician ever has accepted gifts from lobbyists) We know that Murray thinks this is true because he points out that other politicians have done what Jane accuses Senator B of doing (accepting lobbyists' gifts). We know that Jane thinks this is true because she refers to the senator's offense, which we know is a reference to accepting gifts from lobbyists.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free