A certain species of bird has two basic varieties: crested and noncrested. The birds, which generally live in flocks that contain only crested or only noncrested birds, tend to select mates of the same variety as themselves. However, if a bird that is raised in a flock in which all other members the birds’ preference for crested or noncrested mates is learned rather than genetically determined.
What this question is testing
Conclusion
The author is saying these birds aren't born preferring their own variety — they learn it from their flock.
Evidence
The case for that: take a noncrested bird and raise it among only crested birds. Even though it's genetically noncrested, it grows up to prefer crested mates. So the surrounding flock seems to drive the preference.
Evaluate
To make this case stronger, we'd want more evidence ruling out genetics. The strongest support would be a setup where the bird was raised in a mixed environment with no clear "type" to imprint on — and ended up with no preference. That would tell us preference doesn't come from genes (which would still produce a same-variety preference) — it comes from what the bird grows up around.
Goal
Find an answer where rearing in a neutral environment leads to no preference — showing the preference must be learned.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.