Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT13 S3 P1 Q4 Explanation

Neuron Formation

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsWeakenScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

A major tenet of the neurosciences has been that all neurons (nerve cells) in the brains of vertebrate animals are formed early in development. An adult vertebrate, it was believed, must make do with a fixed number of neurons: those lost through disease or injury are not replaced, and cells but through modification of connections among existing ones.

However, new evidence for neurogenesis (the birth of new neurons) has come from the study of canary song. Young canaries and other songbirds learn to sing much as humans learn to speak, by imitating models provided by their elders. Several weeks after birth, a young bird produces its first rudimentary attempts at acquires new songs, and by the next breeding season it has developed an entirely new repertoire.

Recent neurological research into this learning and relearning process has shown that the two most important regions of the canary’s brain related to the learning of songs actually vary in size at different times of the year. In the spring, when the bird’s song is highly developed and uniform, the regions are all the brain cells needed to process and retain all the information gathered over a lifetime.

Although the idea of neurogenesis in the adult mammalian brain is still not generally accepted, these findings might help uncover a mechanism that would enable the human brain to repair itself through neurogenesis. Whether such replacement of neurons would disrupt complex learning processes or long-term memory is not known, but songbird research brain and to learn how to activate them in the adult brain.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the explanation proposed by the author in

Answer choices

  1. Strengthens, if anything6% picked this

    A number of songbird species related to the canary have a shorter life span than the canary and

    The author thought that the long life span of the canary was part of the causal explanation for why it has this cycle of neuron-dumping followed by neurogenesis. So this answer would strengthen like a No Cause / No Effect type answer, since it's saying that species that don't have the canary's long life span don't have this cycle of neurogenesis.

  2. Strengthens8% picked this

    The brain size of several types of airborne birds with life spans similar to those of canaries has been shown to vary according

    This corroborates the author's explanation in a More Cause / More Effect style. Since the author thought that a canary's long life span was part of the causal explanation for having the cycle of neurogenesis, we're adding plausibility to that story by pointing to other birds that have similar long life spans and also have a cycle of neurogenesis.

  3. Correct64% picked this

    Several species of airborne birds similar to canaries in size are known to have brains that are substantially

    Why this is right

    This makes the author's explanation implausible. He was saying, "There's no way canaries could fly if they had the larger/heavier brain it would take to keep a lifetime's worth of songs up in their domes." This answer is saying, "Yes, they could. There are airborne birds similar to a canary's size that have brains that are way heavier than a canary's brain. So bigger-brain-weight would not be holding them back from flight."

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Strengthens18% picked this

    Individual canaries that have larger-than-average repertoires of songs tend to have better developed

    The author thinks that the more songs a canary has in its brain, the heavier/larger the brain will be, and the harder it would be for the canary to fly. This answer is corroborating those connections by showing that as individual canaries have abnormally large repertoires of songs weighing down their brains, they develop (or needed) stronger muscles for flying.

  5. Strengthens4% picked this

    Individual canaries with smaller and lighter brains than the average tend to retain a smaller-than-average

    The author's explanation was kinda like this, the more songs you have in your repertoire, the bigger/heavier your brain would have to be. Another way to say the same thing is the fewer songs you have in your repertoire, the smaller / lighter your brain would have to be. And this answer is lending credence to that association.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free