Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT129 S4 P3 Q13 Explanation

Willa Cather

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The following passages are adapted from critical essays on the American Cather (1873–1947).

Passage A When Cather gave examples of high quality in fiction, she invariably cited Russian writers Ivan Turgenev or Leo Tolstoy or both. Indeed, Edmund Wilson noted in 1922 that Cather followed the manner of Turgenev, not depicting her characters’ emotions directly but telling us how they behave and letting their “inner to avoid overloading the work with unnecessary detail, concentrating instead on what is characteristic and typical.

Here we have an impressionistic aesthetic that anticipates Cather’s: what Turgenev referred to as secret knowledge Cather called “the thing not named.” In one essay she writes that “whatever is felt upon the page without being specifically named there—that, one might say, is created.” For both writers, there is the absolute importance all the elements of narrative for these writers is the establishment of a prevailing mood.

Passage B In a famous 1927 letter, Cather writes of her novel Death Comes for the Archbishop, “Many [reviewers] assert vehemently that it is not a novel. Myself, I prefer to call it a narrative.” Cather’s preference anticipated an important reformulation of the criticism of fiction: the body of literary theory, called which takes as its object “narrative” rather than the “novel,” seems exactly appropriate to Cather’s work.

Indeed, her severest critics have always questioned precisely her capabilities as a novelist. Morton Zabel argued that “[Cather’s] themes...could readily fail to find the structure and substance that might have given them life or redeemed them from the tenuity of a sketch”; Leon Edel called one of her novels “two inconclusive fragments.” “non-novelistic” structures indirectly articulate the essential and conflicting forces of desire at work throughout Cather’s fiction.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

If the author of passage A were to read passage B, he or she would be most likely to agree with which

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: narrative vs. novel2% picked this

    Though Cather preferred to call Death Comes for the Archbishop a narrative rather than a novel, she would be unlikely to view most of

    Passage A never discussed any distinction between narrative and novel. And Passage A never made it seem like Death Comes for the Archbishop was some outlier that stood apart from the rest of Cather's works. So we have no means to support this answer.

  2. Out of Scope: critics' focus2% picked this

    The critics who questioned Cather's abilities as a novelist focused mostly on her failed experiments and ignored her

    Passage A never talks about critics at all, nor alludes to whether Cather's work was heralded or misunderstood by critics. Passage A never suggested that some of Cather's work ventured in the realm of unsuccessful experimentalism, whereas other works were more aesthetically complete. So we don't have any support for this claim.

  3. Out of Scope: novels, not narrative12% picked this

    A model of criticism that takes narrative rather than the novel as its object is likely to result in

    Passage A never talked about the distinction between novel and narrative. However, since Passage A's characterization of Cather's writing seems to align pretty well with Passage B's, if anything we would presume that Passage A would agree with Passage B's assessment of how Cather's works should be critically evaluated. Passage B says that "a model of criticism which takes as its object narrative rather than the novel seems exactly appropriate to Cather's work, which is the opposite of what this answer is saying.

  4. Out of Scope: embraced conventions8% picked this

    Critics who questioned Cather's abilities as a novelist fail to perceive the extent to which Cather actually embraced the

    This answer makes it sound like Passage A wants to make a strong case for the idea that Cather was a great novelist, one who very much embraced the conventions of the realistic novel. Passage A never talks about "the realistic novel" at all. And the portrayal we get of Cather in both passages is that she's going against the mainstream. She's a little weird. She's different. She's in a club with Turgenev and Tolstoy. We don't see her embracing conventions.

  5. Correct76% picked this

    Cather's goal of representing the "thing not named" explains her preference for the bold, simple, and stylized in

    Why this is right

    This answer makes a Causal Claim that we won't necessarily find direct support for in Passage A, but at least Passage A talked about the ideas in this answer choice. The other answer choices all seemed to revolve around this "is she writing novels, or is she writing narrative?" issue that was only found in Passage B. The phrase "bold / simple / stylized in character" comes from the end of Passage B. Passage A tells us that Cather referred to impressionistic aesthetic as "the thing not named", and for her "there is the absolute importance of selection and simplification / art is the fusing of the physical world of settings and actions with the emotional reality of the characters". None of this is actually making the causal claim made in this answer, but it's a reasonable speculation that if A's author were reading passage B, they would be nodding their head in agreement, "Yes, yes ... I agree with all the things you're saying about Cather, and can I just add, 'the thing not named' is the aesthetic goal behind all this." Overall, this correct answer is weirdly unsatisfying because Passage A doesn't really have great support for the idea that Cather preferred bold / stylized characters or landscapes. So this becomes a good reminder that correct answers can be very inadequately supported, as long as they're still the 'best available'. Sometimes it's helpful to remind ourselves that Some Support > No Support. We have at least some scraps of support for this answer, whereas for the others, we had nothing.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free