Reading Comprehension

PT129 · S4 · P1 · Q2 The FCC and Public Interest

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The United States government agency responsible for overseeing television and radio broadcasting, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), had an early history of addressing only the concerns of parties with an economic interest in broadcasting—chiefly broadcasting companies.

Topic

The 1960s United Church of Christ case that forced the FCC to give the public standing in broadcasting license proceedings.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy. The author tells the story of a closed regulatory system being opened up by a citizens' group, with clear approval of the result.

Main Point

The FCC originally only listened to broadcasters' economic interests, but the United Church of Christ's persistent legal challenge — culminating in a court revoking a Mississippi station's license — established that citizens' groups speaking for community concerns have standing to challenge license renewals, opening broadcasting to public input.

P1: The closed FCC

The FCC originally addressed only parties with economic interests in broadcasting. Citizens couldn't speak at hearings unless they were applying for a license, so the FCC effectively served the industry alone.

P2: The Jackson station case

In 1964 the United Church of Christ — representing Jackson, Mississippi's African American population — petitioned for a hearing about a local station accused of advocating segregation and excluding integration coverage. The FCC denied a hearing on the grounds that the church lacked the required economic interest, accepted the misconduct claims, and granted a short probationary renewal anyway. The author suggests the real reason was to keep citizens' groups out of FCC proceedings.

P3: The court overrules the FCC

The church appealed and won a 1967 hearing, but the FCC dismissed public input and granted a full renewal. On the church's second appeal, a judge revoked the station's license without remand, ruling that the church's members were performing a public service and should have the right to challenge the renewal.

2.

The author mentions some additional topics now discussed at FCC hearings (last sentence of the passage) primarily in order to

  1. Correct

    support the author's claim that

    Why this is right

    The purpose of the last sentence of the last paragraph is to support the first sentence of the last paragraph.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    92% picked this

  2. suggest the level of vigilance

    Wrong Purpose

    The list is not a warning, but rather a set of examples that support the author’s conclusion.

    0% picked this

  3. provide an explanation of why

    Outside Support Window

    The court decision (fourth paragraph) explains why the public is allowed to question the performance of broadcasters.

    3% picked this

  4. illustrate other areas of misconduct

    Unsupported

    The list of topics do not necessarily apply to the station discussed in the passage.

    3% picked this

  5. demonstrate that the station discussed

    Unsupported

    The passage does not discuss stations other than the one in Jackson, Mississippi.

    2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free