Logical Reasoning

PT129 · S3 · Q13 Art historian: More than

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Art historian: More than any other genre of representational painting, still-life painting lends itself naturally to art whose goal is the artist's self-expression, rather than merely the reflection of a preexisting external reality.

Statements

causal (this is because)

In still-life painting, the artist invariably chooses, modifies, and arranges the objects to be painted. This results in still-life painting being conducive to the goal of the artist's self-expression.

causal (thus)

The fact that still-life painters can manipulate the objects to be painted means that still-life painters have more control than landscape or portrait painters.

Evaluate

Since the most common pattern on Most Supported is causal inferences, we would be most attracted to the Causal Connector Language like "this is because" and "thus".

The correct answer will probably reward us for understanding those causal relationships.

Being able to choose and modify the objects to be painted leads to better self-expression and leads to more control over composition/subject.

We can tease out hidden truths there such as - choosing, modifying, and arranging the objects to be painted is an act of self-expression

(implied difference) - in a lanscape or portrait painting, the painter doesn't have much control when it comes to choosing, arranging, and modifying the things being painted.

13.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the art historian's statements?

  1. Landscape painting and portraiture are

    Too Strong (most naturally)

    While landscape painting and portraiture lend themselves more naturally to the mere reflection of a preexisting external reality than does still-life painting, to say that they lend themselves the best to such reflection goes too far.

    7% picked this

  2. The only way in which

    Too Strong

    While artists do control the composition and subject of a painting by choosing, modifying, and arranging the objects to be painted, to say that those are the only ways artists control the composition and subject goes too far.

    4% picked this

  3. Nonrepresentational painting does not lend

    Out of Scope

    Nonrepresentational painting is not discussed in the argument.

    10% picked this

  4. Correct

    In genres of representational painting

    Why this is right

    This reinforces the Causal Difference-Maker identified by "This is because". The fact that still-life painters can choose/arrange/modify the objects to be painted is WHY still-life lends itself more to the painter's self expression than does any other genre of representational painting. There's an implied difference there that all the other genres of representational painting don't have that feature of allowing the painter to choose/arrange/modify the objects to be painted.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    74% picked this

  5. When painting a portrait, artists

    Contradiction

    The argument suggests that still-life painting lends itself more naturally to art whose goal is the artist’s self-expression. Since choosing, modifying, and arranging the objects to be painted is typical of still-life painting, this answer opposes the argument.

    5% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free