Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT129 S2 Q9 Explanation

Even if many more people

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Even if many more people in the world excluded meat from their diet, world hunger would significantly reduced.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
9.

Which one of the following, if true, most calls into question the

Answer choices

  1. Strengthens4% picked this

    Hunger often results from natural disasters like typhoons or hurricanes, which sweep away everything

    This reduces the amount of hunger that can be reduced by increasing the food supply.

  2. Too Weak1% picked this

    Both herds and crops are susceptible to devastating viral and

    This reduces the food produced by both herds and crops. By itself, this doesn’t suggest that a switch to crops would increase the food supply.

  3. Correct87% picked this

    The amount of land needed to produce enough meat to feed one person for a week can grow enough grain to feed more

    Why this is right

    This suggests that there is an opportunity to produce 10x more food than the current level of meat production just by switching to crops. That might put more than a dent in world hunger.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Strengthens3% picked this

    Often people go hungry because they live in remote barren areas where there is no efficient distribution

    This reduces the amount of hunger that can be reduced by increasing the food supply.

  5. Strengthens5% picked this

    Most historical cases of famine have been due to bad social and economic policies or catastrophes such

    If famines have been caused by bad economic and social policies or catastrophes such as massive crop failure, then crops aren’t necessarily going to produce more food than herds of cattle or flocks of birds producing meat.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free