Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT129 S2 Q11 Explanation

Pat: E-mail fosters anonymity

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Pat: E-mail fosters anonymity, which removes barriers to self- revelation. This promotes a degree of intimacy with strangers that would otherwise personal contact to attain.

Amar: Frankness is not intimacy. Intimacy requires a real social bond, and social bonds cannot be personal contact.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

The dialogue most strongly supports the claim that Pat and Amar disagree with each

Answer choices

  1. Half Scope5% picked this

    barriers to self-revelation hinder the initial growth

    Yes, Pat would agree with this, but Amar doesn't weigh in on whether barriers to self-revelation have any effect on intimacy.

  2. Both Agree8% picked this

    E-mail can increase intimacy between

    No one is going to argue the extreme claim that "email cannot ever increase intimacy between friends", so they would likely agree with this. We know Pat thinks intimacy can be achieved over email, and Amar thinks that intimacy is possible between friends (who have had personal contact but may nonetheless also interact over email).

  3. Correct83% picked this

    intimacy between those who communicate with each other solely by e-mail

    Why this is right

    Correct: Pat says Yes, Amar says No This gets at the second of our predictions: whether direct personal contact is / isn't necessary. Since Amar thinks direct personal contact is necessary for intimacy, he would be committed to the idea that if you communicate "solely by email" then you don't have direct personal contact and thus you can't have intimacy. Pat, meanwhile, clearly believes that email can promote intimacy that would otherwise be achieved through years of direct personal contact, so she seems to believe that email itself can create the intimacy.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Strong: "always"2% picked this

    real social bonds always lead to

    Both of them would probably disagree with this because of how strongly it's worded. Amar thinks that social bonds are necessary for intimacy, but this answer is claiming that they are sufficient to always produce intimacy.

  5. Half Scope2% picked this

    the use of e-mail removes barriers

    We know that Pat would agree that this does occur in at least some cases. But we haven't heard anything from Amar that would allow us to infer his opinions on whether email can ever remove barriers to frankness. If anything, he seems to accept Pat's notion that email can lead to more self-revelation / frankness.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free