Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT128 S4 P4 Q26 Explanation

Cosmic Justice

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrincipleLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A discusses the views of the economist and political thinker Thomas Sowell. Passage B is article by Sowell.

Passage

"Cosmic justice," as Sowell uses the term, refers to the perfect justice that only an omniscient being could render—rewards and punishments that are truly deserved when all relevant things are properly taken into consideration. Inherent human limitations, however, make it impossible to achieve this type of justice through human law, even though understand all the complex causal interrelationships involved or even know definitively what cosmic justice really is.

Whether somebody truly deserves something is a very difficult thing for us to determine. For one thing, we are not knowledgeable enough about the person and situation, or smart enough, even if we knew what all the critical factors were, to perform the complicated calculus necessary to understand how the complex interrelationships best we can reasonably do is judge primarily based upon outputs, or consequences, rather than inputs.

Passage

Cosmic justice is not simply a higher degree of traditional justice; it is a fundamentally different concept. Traditionally, justice or injustice is characteristic of a process. A defendant in a criminal case would be said to have received justice if the trial were conducted as it should be, under fair rules and innocent person. In short, traditional justice is about impartial processes rather than either results or prospects.

On the other hand, cosmic justice foolishly seeks to correct, not only biased or discriminatory acts by individuals or social institutions, but unmerited disadvantages in general, from whatever source they may arise. In criminal trials, for example, before a murderer is sentenced, the law permits his traumatic childhood to be taken into reduces that deterrence and allows more crime to take place at the expense of innocent people.

What this question is testing

Principle

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
26.

The discussion in passage A, but not the discussion in passage B, relies on which one of

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong17% picked this

    One should refrain from action when one lacks

    This principle is so strong that if we followed it, no one would ever do anything. We almost never have complete information, so this rule would be that we always refrain from action. We need a principle that doesn't sound so kooky.

  2. Opposite1% picked this

    Whether a punishment is fair matters less than whether it

    This is more about Passage B's operative principle. B cared about deterrence, whereas A didn't mention it.

  3. Bad Conclusion Match28% picked this

    Although we should aim at perfect justice, we should recognize that we

    We want to hear, "Because we recognize that we cannot attain it, we should not aim at perfect (cosmic) justice".

  4. Opposite9% picked this

    One should not pass judgment on an action unless one knows all of the factors

    This sounds like someone who is in favor of cosmic justice. This is saying we should try to surmise all the influential factors, the way an omniscient cosmic judge would. Passage A recognizes that's impossible and so suggests we should abandon that pursuit.

  5. Correct45% picked this

    If a goal is known to be impossible, then it should

    Why this is right

    The second sentence of Psg A says "Inherent human limitations make it impossible to achieve this type of [cosmic] justice". The following sentence says, "our human legal systems should not try to dispense cosmic justice".

    Skill tested: Principle · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free