Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT128 S4 P1 Q1 Explanation

New Zealand's Wool Growers

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMain PointSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The 50 million sheep of New Zealand outnumber its people 13 to 1, the highest such ratio in the world. At the wool industry's peak, in the 1950s, the wool growers of New Zealand delivered well over a third of that country's total export revenues. Yet this figure has declined drastically, as beef, lamb, milk, butter, cheese, fish, fruit, and wood and pulp as an agricultural export earner.

Rather than raising wool prices, the only reliable route to profitability lies, as in any agricultural enterprise, in improving productivity. New Zealand's commercial sheep farmers need to achieve the same kind of annual productivity gains that manufacturers of synthetic materials have recorded. This goal could readily be achieved if the industry as practices of the country's leading (and comfortably profitable) wool growers.

Gains on the order of those achieved by the world's cotton growers—who on average have been improving productivity at several times the rate of wool growers—can come wholly through better farm management. At present, wool growing in New Zealand, like agriculture everywhere, is deeply divided. On the one side are professional operations side are family farmers willing to receive a substantially lower return to maintain their lifestyle.

To encourage increased overall productivity, the establishment of a commercial genetic research company (which would concentrate on genetic selection for crossbreeding sheep, not on the artificial manipulation of genetic material in individual sheep) is recommended. This would represent a shift in spending away from industry efforts to improve the efficiency of wool the country's average sheep, and these superior sheep can be identified and kept as breeding stock.

What this question is testing

Main Point

Your task

Capture the passage's overall primary point — the claim everything else supports.

Common trap

Answers that are true but too narrow (a single paragraph) or too broad (beyond the passage's scope).

Winning move

Summarize the whole passage in one sentence first, then match it to a choice.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
1.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of

Answer choices

  1. Opposite2% picked this

    New Zealand wool growers should be encouraged to shift to other agricultural exports

    This answer is telling the wool growers that the Solution to their problem is to give up on wool and try exporting a different product. We want the answer to say the Solution to their problem is to copy the methods of the top growers.

  2. Unrelated to Purpose1% picked this

    Wool growing in New Zealand parallels agricultural practices worldwide in that it is becoming deeply divided between large professional

    This answer has nothing to do with the Problem / Solution framework. At best we could say this names the Problem, but it doesn't even really do that. Instead of focusing on the central topic (New Zealand's wool growers), this answer is making it seem like the passage was mainly focused on a global trend of family vs. factory farms.

  3. Wrong Emphasis: Problem, not Solution11% picked this

    New Zealand's wool industry has been adversely affected by the development and

    In any Problem / Solution passage in which there is an actual solution that's recommended, the solution is the must-have for our main point. An author who writes a Problem / Solution passage tells us about the Problem as background, but her real purpose in writing the passage is to communicate what she sees as the solution. This answer only tells us the problem. We need to hear the Solution: New Zealand's wool growers should copy the methods of the top growers.

  4. Correct82% picked this

    Superior farm management should be encouraged among New Zealand's wool growers to revitalize the

    Why this is right

    This has the recommendation vibe ("should be encouraged") that sounds like we're hearing the author's Solution. We were looking to match up with the end of the 2nd paragraph, where the author says that we could readily fix this problem if the industry as a whole adopted the practices of the leading wool growers. Does "adopting the practices of the leading wool growers (who are comfortably profitable)" qualify as "superior farm management"? Sure, in fact the first sentence of the 3rd paragraph even uses similar language: Gains ... can come wholly through better farm management.

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Trap4% picked this

    The wool industry in New Zealand has put too much focus on increasing the efficiency of processing and has failed to address

    Too Narrow Out of Scope: dwindling stocks The main point of this passage should sound like a solution / recommendation, which this answer does not sound like. This answer sounds like it's pinpointing a problem. We might "hear" an implicit recommendation, like, "Don't do the thing I just said was problematic". But this answer makes it sound like the author's main purpose was to describe something that already happened. Meanwhile, we think the author's main purpose was to recommend what we should do next. This answer would be much better if it simply said, "The wool industry should put less focus on increasing the efficiency of processing and more focus into the issue of selective breeding". Even still, it would be a bit narrow. The broader, umbrella claim is that wool growers in NZ should be adopting the habits of the top performers. Shifting from processing efficiency to selective breeding would be one such way. Finally, this answer is talking about "dwindling breeding stocks". The passage never suggested that we're running out of breeding stocks. It's just saying that we can make much more money if we focus on finding the breeding stocks that yield the most profitable wool, and then make sure that we're breeding as much of those genetically optimized sheep.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free