Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT127 S4 P3 Q17 Explanation

Roma Minority Group

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMeaning in ContextLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A There is no universally accepted definition within international law for the term “national minority.” It is most commonly applied to (1) groups of persons—not necessarily citizens—under the jurisdiction of one country who have ethnic ties to another “homeland” country, or (2) groups of citizens of a country who have lasting reason, perhaps, “people” is often used instead of “nation” for groups subject to a colonial power.

While the lack of definition of the terms “minority,” “people,” and “nation” presents difficulties to numerous minority groups, this lack is particularly “problematic” for the Roma (Gypsies). The Roma are not a colonized people, they do not have a homeland, and many do not bear ties to any currently existing country. Some have ethnic and linguistic ties to other groups of Roma that reside in other countries.

Passage B Capotorti’s definition of a minority includes four empirical criteria—a group’s being numerically smaller than the rest of the population of the state; their being nondominant; their having distinctive ethnic, linguistic, or religious characteristics; and their desiring to preserve their own culture—and one legal criterion, that they be citizens of the reference to empirical characteristics, it seems patently unfair that it should be included in the definition.

However, the Roma easily fulfill the four objective elements of Capotorti’s definition and should, therefore, be considered a minority in all major European states. Numerically, they are nowhere near a majority, though they number in the hundreds of thousands, even millions, in some states. Their nondominant position is evident—they are not even and identity through centuries of persecution is evidence enough of their desire to preserve their culture.

What this question is testing

Meaning in Context

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

The term "problematic" has which one of the following meanings in both passage A (second paragraph of Passage A) and passage B (first

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: intense debate2% picked this

    giving rise to intense

    There doesn't seem to be any talk of "intense debate" anywhere in the passage, and the two mentions of minority-definitions being problematic for the Roma were definitely not saying that they cause the Roma to have intense debate.

  2. Weaker Match16% picked this

    confusing and

    This answer is tempting, but it doesn't swap into the place of "problematic" as successfully as the correct answer does. We can't match this with passage A very well. It would be saying "the lack of clear definitions for minority, people, and nation is particularly confusing/unclear for the Roma". The definitions themselves might be confusing and unclear, since we're being told that we lack clear definitions. But this is saying "the lack is confusing and unclear". The passage is saying "Because there are no clear definitions for these terms (there are only confusing and unclear terms), the Roma in particular have a problem." Confusing / unclear is the source of the problem, but the actual problem is that the Roma don't qualify for minority status. We could possibly say that "problematic" in Passage B means something like confusing and unclear, since the first paragraph of B is saying that some states deny the Roma citizenship and thus minority status. So the legal criterion that "they be citizens of the state in question" can be problematic/confusing/unclear, if the Roma are confused / unclear on whether or not they are considered citizens of a given state. But by the end of the first paragraph of B, the author is saying, "it seems patently unfair that this problematic 4th part should be included in the definition". So problematic seems to mean more like "unfair" than "unclear".

  3. Correct73% picked this

    resulting in

    Why this is right

    This is really just what "problematic" means in its most obvious definition: creating problems / resulting in difficulties. It's very odd to see the correct answer be our most common association with a word, but this answer seems to best fit the two usages. In passage A, we're saying, "the lack of a clear definition for certain terms involved in minority status classification is particularly likely to result in difficulties for the Roma". In passage B, we're saying, "the fourth part of the definition of minority, that the group must be citizens of the state in question, can result in difficulties, given that the Roma's citizenship could be denied by the state and thus the state has the power to decide if the Roma constitute a minority."

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Bad Match6% picked this

    difficult to

    This answer is trying to appeal to our dictionary sense of "problematic / problem", as in something requiring a solution. But this would mean that Passage A was saying, the lack of clearly defined terms for the legal definition of minority is particularly difficult to solve for the Roma. That doesn't make any sense. The Roma aren't tasked with solving this problem. They are just particularly victimized / adversely affected by this problem.

  5. Too Strong: incoherent3% picked this

    theoretically

    The authors complain that the definitions of minority are at times unclear or give too much leverage to individual states to decide whether to grant citizenship / minority status, but neither author is saying the definitions of minority are incoherent, which is a really strong accusation that someone is speaking nonsense.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free