Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT127 S4 P2 Q8 Explanation

Inclusive Fitness Theory

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMain PointScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Mechanisms for recognizing kin are found throughout the plant and animal kingdoms, regardless of an organism's social or mental complexity. Improvements in the general understanding of these mechanisms have turned some biologists' attention to the question of why kin recognition occurs at all. One response to this question is offered by the the honeybee, most of whose members do not produce offspring and exist only to nurture relatives.

Inclusive fitness theory has also been applied usefully to new findings concerning cannibalism within animal species. Based on the theory, cannibals should have evolved to avoid eating their own kin because of the obvious genetic costs of such a practice. Spadefoot toad tadpoles provide an illustration. Biologists have found that all tadpoles when it becomes very hungry, apparently putting its own unique genetic makeup ahead of its siblings'.

But there may be other reasons why organisms recognize kin. For example, it has recently been found that tiger salamander larvae, also either omnivorous or cannibalistic, are plagued in nature by a deadly bacterium. Furthermore, it was determined that cannibal larvae are especially likely to be infected by eating diseased species members. which an organism preserves its own life, not as a means to aid in relatives' survival.

What this question is testing

Main Point

Your task

Capture the passage's overall primary point — the claim everything else supports.

Common trap

Answers that are true but too narrow (a single paragraph) or too broad (beyond the passage's scope).

Winning move

Summarize the whole passage in one sentence first, then match it to a choice.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
8.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of

Answer choices

  1. Correct78% picked this

    Some findings support the hypothesis that kin recognition emerged through natural selection because it increased organisms' total genetic representation, but this hypothesis may not

    Why this is right

    Paragraph 2 gives us the findings that support the inclusive fitness explanation for kin recognition (helping relatives "increases your own total genetic representation"), whereas inclusive fitness does not explain all instances of kin recognition. Paragraph 3 talks about a case (tiger salamanders) where kin recognition is not being done in order to help relatives, but rather to help oneself survive. This answer is being cheeky by avoiding using the term inclusive fitness theory, but it has our central topic, Kin recognition, and it's providing the passage's answers to the central purpose of, "Why does kin recognition occur? How did it emerge evolutionarily?"

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Unsupported Comparison: as various14% picked this

    Current research supports the view that the mechanisms enabling the members of a species to recognize close relatives are as various as

    This answer is saying that the number of ways that species have to recognize kin matches the number of reasons that species have to want to recognize kin. What a weird sentiment! The main point of the passage was definitely not a cool mathematical observation: "Check it out everyone --- there are 13 different reasons why species would want to recognize kin, and there are 13 different mechanisms that species can use to recognize kin." Within this passage we learned of two general purposes served by kin recognition, "protecting relatives vs. protecting oneself", and we learned of one mechanism for kin recognition, "nipping at other tadpoles". We have no idea how tiger salamanders recognize kin. We only talked about why they do.

  3. Wrong Emphasis Opposite: undermines2% picked this

    Recent research involving tiger salamanders undermines the hypothesis concerning the purpose of kin recognition that is espoused

    We don't need to keep reading beyond the first five words. There's no way the central topic of the passage was "recent research involving tiger salamanders", so that should not be the Naming Part of our main point answer. Tiger salamanders were brought in as a qualifying subsidiary point at the end. "Yes, inclusive fitness offers a partial answer to why kin recognition develops, but there are other reasons why kin recognition develops. For example, tiger salamanders." Also, because the tiger salamander example showed how kin recognition benefited the individual, it was supporting, not undermining traditional evolutionary theory.

  4. Wrong Emphasis1% picked this

    New research involving tiger salamanders indicates that the traditional theory of natural selection is more strongly supported by the evidence than is thought by

    Again, it would seem very weird to start a main point sentence with "tiger salamanders", when they were just a subsidiary part of the passage. The main event is "kin recognition", which this answer doesn't even mention once. This answer makes it sound like the passage was a Challenge Position passage, trying to debunk a group of theorists who argued that the traditional theory of natural selection is not strongly supported by evidence, given the case of the spadefoot toad tadpoles.

  5. Strong / Contradicted: fully explained5% picked this

    While traditional evolutionary theory was unable to account for the phenomenon of kin recognition, this phenomenon is fully explained

    The author says at the end of the 2nd paragraph that inclusive fitness "offers at least a partial answer", and then at the beginning of the 3rd paragraph says, "but there may be other reasons why organisms recognize kin". So the author explicitly suggests that inclusive fitness theory does not fully explain kin recognition.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free