Newspaper article: People who take vitamin C supplements tend to be healthier than average.
Conclusion
People who take vitamin C supplements tend to be healthier than average.
Evidence
A study investigating the relationship between high doses of vitamin C and heart disease showed that people who regularly consume high doses of vitamin C supplements have a significantly lower than average risk of heart disease.
Evaluate
We're given a curious fact -- why is there a correlation between high doses of vit C || lower risk of heart disease ?
Does the author offer a causal explanation for the correlation?
Not really. The conclusion isn't causal. It's just saying that ppl who take vit C supplements tend to be healthier than average.
"Tend to be" is just a statistical claim, not a causal one. So we probably shouldn't be trying to attack this question like we would a causal argument (trying to think of Alternate Explanations for the curious fact or trying to hurt the plausibility of the causal storyline the author is selling us).
So we can just think, in typical weaken fashion,
Goal
Given that ppl who take high doses of vit C have lower risk of heart disease, how can we say that ppl who take vitamin C do not tend to be healthier than average?
Maybe most ppl who take vitamin C don't take high doses of it, so the evidence is irrelevant to the conclusion. Maybe most ppl who take vit C are good when it comes to heart disease, but have lots of other health problems (thus they wouldn't be healthier than average, overall).