Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT127 S3 Q11 Explanation

The sun emits two types

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The sun emits two types of ultraviolet radiation that damage skin: UV-A, which causes premature wrinkles, and UV-B, which causes sunburn. Until about ten years ago, but not against UV-A radiation.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

Which one of the following is best supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope1% picked this

    Since about ten years ago, the percentage of people who wear sunscreen every time they spend time in

    The statements provide information on the various forms of protection provided by sunscreen, but not on the usage rate.

  2. Reversed Premise1% picked this

    Most people whose skin is prematurely wrinkled have spent a large amount of time in the

    It’s known that those who are exposed to UV-A radiation develop wrinkles, but this turns the relationship around and suggests that most people with wrinkles were exposed to UV-A radiation. It could be the case that UV-A radiation is one of many factors that cause wrinkles and so this answer isn’t supported by the statements.

  3. Too Strong4% picked this

    The specific cause of premature skin wrinkling was not known until about

    While sunscreen didn’t protect against UV-A radiation until about ten years ago, the statements do not suggest why. It’s possible that premature wrinkling was known to be an affect of UV-A radiation and yet it wasn’t understood how to protect against that risk until about ten years ago.

  4. Contradicted7% picked this

    People who wear sunscreen now are less likely to become sunburned than were people who spent the same amount of time in the

    The statements suggest that people who wear sunscreen now are equally likely to become sunburned as people who spent an equal amount of time in the sun wearing sunscreen ten years ago. Sunscreen offered protection from sunburn ten years ago just as it does today.

  5. Correct88% picked this

    Until about ten years ago, people who wore sunscreen were no less likely to have premature wrinkles than were people who spent the same

    Why this is right

    Until about ten years ago sunscreen offered no protection against wrinkles, so a comparison of individuals who were equally exposed to the sun and who wore sunscreen with those who did not would find that those who wore sunscreen were no less likely to have premature wrinkles (i.e., those who wore sunscreen received no benefit with regard to wrinkles).

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free