Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT127 S2 Q4 Explanation

The song of the yellow warbler

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsNecessary Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The song of the yellow warbler signals to other yellow warblers that a particular area has been appropriated by the singer as its own feeding territory. Although the singing deters other yellow warblers from taking over the feeding territory of the singer, other yellow warblers may range for food within a portion during molting, have no competition for the food supply within the range of their restricted flying.

What this question is testing

Necessary Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.

Common trap

Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).

Winning move

Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

The argument makes which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong7% picked this

    The core areas contain just enough food to sustain one yellow warbler

    The argument does not say yellow warblers who sing will find sufficient food, but rather that they won't face competition.

  2. Too Strong2% picked this

    Warblers are the only molting birds that lay claim to core areas of feeding

    Too Strong: the only Out of Scope: other molting birds Whether other molting birds lay claim to areas of feeding territories is not relevant to the argument.

  3. Correct84% picked this

    There are no birds other than yellow warblers that compete with yellow

    Why this is right

    This is a piece of the required ~OWE → ~CF assumption. In order for the absence of other warblers to imply no competition for food. It must be assumed that no other birds compete with yellow warblers for food.

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Weaken4% picked this

    Warblers often share their feeding areas with other kinds of birds, which often do not eat the same insects

    If warblers often share their feeding areas with other kinds of birds (even if sometimes they do not eat the same insects or seeds as warblers do). Warblers are more likely to face competition for food.

  5. Too Strong3% picked this

    The core areas of each feeding territory are the same size for

    Each area need not be exactly the same size.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free