Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT126 S4 Q9 Explanation

Challenge can be an important

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Conform

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Challenge can be an important source of self-knowledge, since those who pay attention to how they react, both emotionally and physically, to challenge into their own weaknesses.

What this question is testing

Principle-Conform

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
9.

Which one of the following most closely conforms to the

Answer choices

  1. Correct87% picked this

    A concert pianist should not have an entirely negative view of a memory lapse during a difficult performance. By understanding why the memory lapse

    Why this is right

    1. The person is challenged? Yes, it is a difficult performance. 2. The person pays attention to how they emotionally / physically reacted to the challenge? Kind of --- they understand why their memory lapse occurred. 3. They gain a useful insight into their weaknesses? Sure -- they can better prepare for future performances. 4. It's an important source of self-knowledge? Kind of -- they shouldn't have an entirely negative view of it, which implies that there is some positive impact coming from it. This answer feels far from obvious or perfect, but it matches up better than the alternatives.

    Skill tested: Principle-Conform · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Bad Match1% picked this

    A salesperson should understand that the commission earned is not the only reward of making a sale. Salespeople should also take satisfaction from the

    1. The person is challenged? Nope, nothing matches with that, unless we just assume that "making a sale" counts as a challenge. 2. The person pays attention to how they emotionally / physically reacted to the challenge? Nope. It doesn't talk about any self-observation that was made as a result of the challenge. It talks about a psychological reaction the people should also have. 3. They gain a useful insight into their weaknesses? Nope. Nothing about weaknesses. If we hadn't already given up on this answer, we should by now.

  3. Bad Match0% picked this

    Compassion is valuable not only for the wonderful feelings it brings, but also for the opportunities it affords to enrich

    1. The person is challenged? Nope, nothing talks about someone being challenged. It's hard to really move onto the other ones, since they all relate to pay attention to how we reacted to the challenge, gaining a useful insight from our reaction to the challenge, etc. If there's no challenge to begin with, then there's no way to get this train rolling.

  4. Bad Match2% picked this

    While some of the value of competition comes from the pleasure of winning, the primary reward of

    1. The person is challenged? Kind of. We'd just be presuming that 'competition' is inherently challenging but it usually is. 2. The person pays attention to how they emotionally / physically reacted to the challenge? Nope. It doesn't talk about any self-observation that was made as a result of competing. 3. They gain a useful insight into their weaknesses? Nope. Nothing about weaknesses. If we hadn't already given up on this answer, we should by now.

  5. Bad Match10% picked this

    Even people who dread public speaking should accept invitations to speak before large groups. People will admire their courage and they will experience the

    1. The person is challenged? Sure, if they dread public speaking, then public speaking is a challenge. 2. The person pays attention to how they emotionally / physically reacted to the challenge? Kind of. This eventually talks about us feeling fulfillment from the fact that we reacted to the challenge by getting through it. 3. The person gains useful insights into their own weaknesses? No, it's a real success story. There's nothing in here about struggling with a weakness and learning something about it. Maybe we could say that the "weakness" was their fear in the first place. And so they gained a useful insight that, "if they conquer fear, they will feel some fulfillment"? 4. It's an important source of self-knowledge? Kind of. "Even people who dread X should do X" sounds like it's stressing the positive that come from challenge. Overall, pitting this against (A), they both describe challenging circumstances, but there's a clearer indication in (A) that someone learned about a specific weakness they had by challenging themselves. "You challenged yourself; you messed up; you learned some useful insight that will help you the next time you're challenged." (E) is more like, "You had a weakness (i.e. a fear), but you challenged yourself to confront it and it felt good."

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free