Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT126 S4 Q7 Explanation

Packaging is vital to a product’s

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Packaging is vital to a product’s commercial success. For example, the maker of a popular drink introduced a “new, improved” version which succeeded in blind taste tests. However, customers did not buy the product when marketed, mainly because the can, almost identical to that used for the earlier version of the beverage, of the old, an expectation not satisfied by the new product.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: more important3% picked this

    Proper product packaging is more important than the quality of

    We know that packing is important, even vital to a product's success. But the quality of the product might also be vital. Your LSAT score and your GPA are both vital to your likelihood of getting into top 10 law schools. We have no way of supporting that packaging is more important than quality.

  2. Too Strong: generally Illegal Negation11% picked this

    Products generally succeed in the market if they are packaged in a manner that accurately

    We definitely can say that "when products aren't packaged in manner that accurately reflects (customer expectations), then it can cause the product to struggle". But we can't negate that into this strong idea that, "When products are packaged in an accurate manner, then more than 50% of the time they succeed."

  3. Too Strong: unless2% picked this

    Changing the packaging of a product will not improve the product’s sales unless the product

    This is even harsher language than (B). It says, "if the product itself doesn't change, then changing the packaging will never improve sales". Not only is that way stronger than anything we can derive, it also seems somewhat undermined by the fact that are being told that packaging does seem to play some causal role in commercial success.

  4. Correct68% picked this

    To succeed in the market, a new product should not be packaged in a way that creates expectations

    Why this is right

    This best reinforces the Causal Difference-Maker that the passage spelled out: The new drink was not bought by customers mainly because the new drink was packaged in a way that created unsatisfied expectations. A pretty safe re-wording of that connection is, "to succeed in having customers buy your new product, you shouldn't package it in a way that creates unsatisfied expectations". If we were told that, "Yale throws away many applications mainly because there are too many grammatical errors in the applicant's personal statements", it's fair to say, "To have a successful application to Yale law school, you should not have many grammatical errors in your personal statement".

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Too Strong: will16% picked this

    An improved version of an existing product will sell better than the earlier version unless the improved version is

    The strength of this comes with total certainty. It's a stronger version of (B). "If an improved version of a product is not packaged like the earlier one, then the improved version of the product will always sell better than the earlier version." We were told that "when the new version was packaged like the old version (which caused unsatisfied expectations, customers didn't buy it". This is negating that idea and taking it to an extreme. "If the new version isn't packaged like the old version, then customers will buy it even more than before!"

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free