Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT126 S3 Q15 Explanation

Theodore will be able to file

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParallel

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Theodore will be able to file his tax return on time only in the event that he has an accountant prepare his tax return and the accountant does not ask Theodore for any additional documentation of his business expenses. If he does have an accountant prepare his return, the accountant Therefore, Theodore will not be able to file on time.

What this question is testing

Parallel

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

The pattern of reasoning in which one of the following arguments most closely parallels the pattern of reasoning

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Structure / Wrong Validity1% picked this

    Given the demands of Timothy's job, his next free evening will occur next Friday. Since he spent a lot of money on his last

    Given the demands of Timothy’s job, his next free evening will occur next Friday. He spent a lot of money on his last evening out. He will probably decide to spend his next free evening at home. Therefore, Timothy will probably be at home next Friday evening. This argument is missing an if/then premise that includes “and” after “then.” Furthermore, there is a gap in the reasoning between the evidence and the intermediate conclusion and so this argument is not valid.

  2. Wrong Structure10% picked this

    Tovah cannot attend the concert next week if she is away on business. If she misses that concert, she will not have another opportunity

    Tovah cannot attend the concert AB → ~NW next week if she is away on business. If she misses that concert [next ~NW → ~TM week], she will not have another opportunity to attend a concert this month. She will be away on business. AB Tovah will not be able to attend ~TM a concert this month. This argument is missing an if/then premise that includes “and” after “then.”

  3. Wrong Structure5% picked this

    Mark's children will not be content this weekend unless he lets them play video games some of the time. Mark will let them play

    Mark’s children will not be C → VG content this weekend unless he lets them play video games some of the time. Mark will let them play video VG → ~PA games, but only at times when he has no other activities planned. Therefore, unless Mark and C → ~PA his children take a break from planned activities, Mark’s children will not be content this weekend. This argument is missing an if/then premise that includes “and” after “then.”

  4. Wrong Structure2% picked this

    If Teresa is not seated in first class on her airline flight, she will be seated in business class. Therefore, since she cannot be

    If Teresa is not seated in ~FC → BC first class on her airline flight, she will be seated in business class. She cannot be seated in ~FC first class on that flight. Therefore, she will BC necessarily be seated in business class. This argument is missing an if/then premise that includes “and” after “then.”

  5. Correct83% picked this

    Susannah will have a relaxing vacation only if her children behave especially well and she does not start to suspect that they are planning

    Why this is right

    Susannah will have a R → BEW + ~SPM relaxing vacation only if her children behave especially well and she does not start to suspect that they are planning some mischief. She will certainly start to BEW → SPM suspect that they are planning some mischief if they behave especially well. Susannah’s vacation ~R cannot possibly be relaxing. To have a relaxing vacation, Susannah’s children must behave especially well and she must not suspect that they are planning mischief. Since the second premise states that those two things are incompatible, Susannah cannot have a relaxing vacation.

    Skill tested: Parallel · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free