Reading Comprehension

PT125 · S3 · P3 · Q19 Technological Developments and Markets

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Because the market system enables entrepreneurs and investors who develop new technology to reap financial rewards from their risk of capital, it may seem that the primary result of this activity is that some people who have spare capital accumulate more.

Topic

The democratizing effects of technology under the market system

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy

Main Point

Despite appearances that technological advancement primarily enriches a small group of investors or entrepreneurs, the overall effect of technology—enabled by the market system—is to make its benefits more broadly accessible, thus narrowing the gap between different social groups over time. (Most Valuable Sentences: last sentence of P1, )

P1: Introduction to the Perceived Problem and Author's Claim

It may seem like only wealthy investors profit from new technology, but actually, technological progress generally helps to narrow the gap between different social groups by spreading its benefits more widely.

P2: Examples of Technology Democratizing Access

The author gives several historical and modern examples: the printing press made reading accessible to the masses, computers now offer access and power once reserved for elite scientists, and technologies like broadcast media and electronic mail have made entertainment and communication universally available, not just for the rich.

P3: Explanation for This Phenomenon

This spread of benefits isn't random; it's a core tendency of the market system. For entrepreneurs to maximize their profits, they need to reach more people, so market competition drives prices down and makes new technologies accessible to more and more people.

19.

It can be most reasonably inferred from the passage that the author would agree with which one of the following statements?

  1. The profits derived from computer

    Too Strong: any other development

    There's nowhere in the passage where the author singles out the profits from computer technology in terms of being "the smallest group of people that have ever profited off a new technological development".

    2% picked this

  2. Correct

    Often the desire of some

    Why this is right

    This sounds like it's reinforcing the 2nd of our two prephrases: the forces of market competition are what spread these benefits widely (in order for the inventor of a new tech to sufficiently cash in, they need to lower the price enough so that tons of people can buy it) The second sentence of the last paragraph supports this claim. "Entrepreneurs and investors are often unable to maximize financial success w/o expanding their market, and this involves ... making their technologies genuinely accessible to an ever-larger share of the population."

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    87% picked this

  3. National boundaries are rarely barriers

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: rarely Out of Scope: national boundaries The author never mentions the effect of national boundaries on how fast new tech spreads, so we have no idea whether she thinks it's rarely a barrier, never a barrier, often a barrier, etc.

    3% picked this

  4. Typically, investment in technology is

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: typically Unknown Comparison: tech vs. other The author never compares the risk of investing in technology to the risk of investing in other things. This is a classic Comparison trap answer where they took an absolute adjective from the passage (the first sentence establishes that investing in technology is a "risk") and turn it into a relative adjective in an answer choice, "riskier".

    1% picked this

  5. Greater geographical mobility of populations

    Out of Scope: geographic mobility

    The passage never discusses ways in which populations are now more geographically mobile than they used to be, let alone a causal relationship between that concept and the profits of tech investors.

    7% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free