Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT125 S3 P2 Q14 Explanation

Roy Lichtenstein

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The painter Roy Lichtenstein helped to define pop art—the movement that incorporated commonplace objects and commercial-art techniques into paintings—by paraphrasing the style of comic books in his work. His merger of a popular genre with the forms and intentions of fine art generated a complex result: while poking fun at the pretensions a seriousness of theme that enabled it to transcend mere parody.

That Lichtenstein’s images were fine art was at first difficult to see, because, with their word balloons and highly stylized figures, they looked like nothing more than the comic book panels from which they were copied. Standard art history holds that pop art emerged as an impersonal alternative to the histrionics of against the fading emotional power of abstract expressionism, rather than an aloof attempt to ignore it.

But if rebellion against previous art by means of the careful imitation of a popular genre were all that characterized Lichtenstein’s work, it would possess only the reflective power that parodies have in relation to their subjects. Beneath its cartoonish methods, his work displayed an impulse toward realism, an urge to say faith in reconciliation, not only between cartoons and fine art, but between parody and true feeling.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Based on the passage, which one of the following does the author appear to believe about the rebellious

Answer choices

  1. Correct66% picked this

    It was directed less against abstract expressionism exclusively than against overly

    Why this is right

    This would be a tough answer to pick on the first pass, since we were looking for "It was rebelling against late abstract expressionism". However, it does fit upon closer inspection. Remember, the "standard art history" is that it was "Lichtenstein vs. Abstract Expressionism". Our author is saying, "no, no, no --- the truth is that Lichtenstein was fine with abstract expressionism; he just not cool with the second generation of it." So we wasn't rebelling against abstract expressionism exclusively (in its totality). Did he hate the second generation stuff because it was overly sophisticated? Yeah, that matches decently with saying the second generation stuff was bad because it was airy, high-minded, and overly lyrical. Airy and high-minded are synonyms for pretentious and overly refined. And overly lyrical kinda sounds like it took itself too seriously or tried to jam in too many ideas. This answer is definitely a bit of a stretch, but we have to remind ourselves it's all about "best available answer".

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Opposite3% picked this

    It was directed less against later abstract expressionism than against

    It was directed specifically against later abstract expressionism, and it employed (and thus endorsed) commercial art.

  3. Opposite20% picked this

    It was directed less against later abstract expressionism exclusively than against abstract

    This is the opposite of the point the author was trying to make. If we reversed the order of terms, this answer would be exactly what we were shopping for: It was directed less against [abstract expressionism in general] than against [later abstract expressionism exclusively].

  4. Unrelated to Goal Opposite, if anything4% picked this

    It was an objection to the consumerism of

    Lichtenstein's work heavily featured consumerism, but as the final paragraph explains, Lichtenstein's work exuded not a jaded cynicism about consumer culture He was not rebelling against consumerism. He was rebelling against the fading emotional power of late abstract expressionism, which this answer choice isn't touching on at all.

  5. Opposite, if anything6% picked this

    It was an objection to the simplicity of line and color used

    Lichtenstein embraced and helped popularize the pop art style, which used simplicity of line and color.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free