Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT125 S2 Q26 Explanation

The government will purchase

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The government will purchase and install new severe weather sirens for this area next year if replacement parts for the old sirens are difficult to obtain. The newspaper claims that public safety in the event of severe weather would be enhanced if new sirens were to be installed. The local company from is correct, the public will be safer during severe weather in the future.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.

Common trap

Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.

Winning move

Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
26.

The argument's conclusion follows logically from its premises if which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Reversed Premise9% picked this

    If public safety in the event of severe weather is enhanced next year, it will be because new

    This reverses the second PSE → NS premise.

  2. Premise Support5% picked this

    The newspaper was correct in claiming that public safety in the event of severe weather would be enhanced

    While this confirms the newspaper’s claim, the conclusion doesn’t rely on the the newspaper’s claim being true since it is conditioned on the claim being true. Furthermore, this fails to ensure that the replacement parts are in fact difficult to obtain.

  3. Too Weak21% picked this

    The local company from which replacement parts for the old sirens were purchased last year was the only company in

    This doesn’t quite ensure that the replacement parts will be difficult to obtain. The parts could still be easy to obtain from a company outside of the local area.

  4. Correct64% picked this

    Replacement parts for the old sirens will be difficult to obtain if the government cannot obtain them from the company it

    Why this is right

    This bridges the gap between ~LC → DO the local company going out of business and the replacement parts being difficult to obtain. So, if the newspaper’s claim is correct, this assumption would ensure that in the event of severe weather the public safety would be enhanced.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Weakens2% picked this

    Because the local company from which replacement parts had been purchased went out of business, the only available parts are of such inferior quality

    Just because the alternative ~LC → IQ parts are of inferior quality doesn’t mean they’re difficult to obtain. And since they’re inferior, it’s possible that the public would be less safe in the event of severe weather.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free