Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT124 S1 Q10 Explanation

Public health experts

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Public health experts have waged a long-standing educational campaign to get people to eat more vegetables, which are known to help prevent cancer. Unfortunately, the campaign has had little impact on people's diets. The reason is probably that many people simply dislike the taste of most vegetables. Thus, it included information on ways to make vegetables more appetizing.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens

Answer choices

  1. No Impact2% picked this

    The campaign to get people to eat more vegetables has had little impact on the diets of most people who

    This mentions a campaign's minimal impact among those who already love vegetables, which is irrelevant, as the focus is on those who don’t find vegetables appetizing.

  2. Opposite (if anything)0% picked this

    Some ways of making vegetables more appetizing diminish vegetables' ability to

    This suggests making vegetables appetizing might reduce their nutritional value, presenting a potential backfire and weakening the argument for the plan's effectiveness at making people healthier.

  3. Unclear Impact1% picked this

    People who find a few vegetables appetizing typically do not eat substantially more vegetables than do people who dislike

    This compares eating habits based on a few appetizing vegetables vs. disliking most, offering unclear relevance to whether new methods will increase vegetable consumption for those who find them unappealing. It's also weird that you could easily be someone who both dislikes most vegetables but finds a few of them appetizing, so these groups are highly overlapping.

  4. Correct90% picked this

    People who dislike the taste of most vegetables would eat many more vegetables if they knew how to

    Why this is right

    This specifically states that people who dislike veggies would eat more if they knew how to make them appetizing, directly supporting the plan’s effectiveness and showing that it targets the Root Issue, therefore strengthening the argument.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Weaker Impact7% picked this

    The only way to make the campaign to get people to eat more vegetables more effective would be to ensure that anyone who at

    We could reword this as, "If we can't ensure that every single person who presently dislikes the taste of certain veggies will learn to find those veggies appetizing, then the campaign will not be effective". Saying "the only way to do X is to do Y" is akin to saying "if you don't do Y, then X won't happen". This answer might seem tempting because it kind of sounds like "the only way to achieve the Goal is to do this Plan", but that doesn't actually mean the Plan will work. If we say, "the only way to win this game is to score a 90 yard touchdown on this last play", that doesn't mean it's at all likely that we'll score a 90 yd TD on the last play. Meanwhile (D) is saying, "If we do the Plan, we will achieve the Goal".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free